Volume 25, Issue 6 pp. 996-1001
Original Researh

MRI-Defined Corpus Callosal Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Comparison of Volumetric Measurements, Corpus Callosum Area and Index

Tobias Granberg

Corresponding Author

Tobias Granberg

Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Tobias Granberg, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, C1-46, Karolinska University Hospital 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Gösta Bergendal

Gösta Bergendal

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Sara Shams

Sara Shams

Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Aspelin

Peter Aspelin

Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Kristoffersen-Wiberg

Maria Kristoffersen-Wiberg

Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Sten Fredrikson

Sten Fredrikson

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Juha Martola

Juha Martola

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 March 2015
Citations: 41

Contributions: TG, JM, GB, PA, SF, and MKW jointly conceived and initiated the study. TG, JM, and GB designed data collection tools. TG, JM, GB, and SS performed data acquisition. TG analyzed the data statistically. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and revised the paper. TG drafted the paper and is guarantor.

ABSTRACT

Objective

To compare corpus callosum area (CCA) and corpus callosum index (CCI) in terms of feasibility and their performance as biomarkers for cognitive and physical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). A secondary aim was to compare these two methods with volumetric measurements.

Methods

This study was based on a cohort of 37 MS patients and a group of age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Physical disability was assessed with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and cognitive disability with the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT). CCA and CCI were assessed on midsagittal brain MRI by 3 raters with varying radiological experience. Volumes of the brain, gray and white matter, corpus callosum, and MS lesions were acquired with Freesurfer and Lesion Segmentation Toolbox for Statistical Parametric Mapping.

Results

CCA and CCI were obtained within seconds with excellent intra- and inter-rater agreement, and outperformed volumetric measurements. CCA had the strongest correlations with both SDMT (r = .82, P < .001) and EDSS (r = −.56, P < .001), and the highest accuracy in differentiating patients from controls (95%) and relapse-remitting MS from progressive forms of MS (77%). CCI performed less well (r = .73, P < .001; r = −.45, P < .001; 94%; 71%). CCA also outperformed the volumetric measurements in these regards.

Conclusions

CCA is a time-effective and robust biomarker that has stronger correlations with both EDSS and information processing speed than CCI and volumetric measurements that are commonly used as outcome measures in MS research and clinical trials.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.