Volume 6, Issue 4S pp. 638-643
Article
Full Access

The Risk of Reoperation in Patients with Bioprosthetic Valves

Uberto Bortolotti M.D.

Uberto Bortolotti M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Aldo Milano M.D.

Aldo Milano M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Eugenio Mossuto M.D.

Eugenio Mossuto M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Francisco Guerra M.D.

Francisco Guerra M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Maurizio Rubino M.D.

Maurizio Rubino M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giulio Rizzoli M.D.

Giulio Rizzoli M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Alessandro Mazzucco M.D.

Alessandro Mazzucco M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Vincenzo Gallucci M.D.

Vincenzo Gallucci M.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: December 1991
Citations: 11
Address for correspondence: U. Bortolotti, M.D., Istituto di Chirurgia Cardiovascolare, Universita di Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. Fax: 49-821-2409.
Presented at the V International Symposium on Cardiac Bioprostheses, Avignon, France, May 24–27, 1991.

Abstract

The risk of operative mortality in patients undergoing a first reoperation for bioprosthetic failure was assessed in a series of patients reoperated upon during the last two decades (1970-1990). A total of 330 such patients underwent replacement of 351 bioprostheses: 88 had aortic; 221 mitral; and 21 mitral and aortic bioprosthetic replacement. Indication for reoperation was in most cases structural valve deterioration (87%), followed by periprosthetic leak (7%) and endocarditis (6%). The operative mortality was significantly higher in patients who preoperatively were in New York Heart Association Functional Class IV or had a lower left ventricular function, In those reoperated because of prosthetic infection, and in those reoperated on an emergency basis. Structural valve deterioration was associated to a substantially low risk; operative mortality has improved in recent years, regardless of the indication for reoperation, partly due to the increasing experience and improved surgical techniques. Our results indicate that in recipients of bioprosthetic valves, careful follow-up with closer surveillance of valve and cardiac function and earlier prosthetic replacement might contribute to reducing the risk of reoperation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.