Volume 35, Issue 10 pp. 2672-2678
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Surgical infection prophylaxis prior to left ventricular assist device implantation: A survey of clinical practice

Ahmad Mourad MD

Ahmad Mourad MD

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Sana Arif MBBS

Sana Arif MBBS

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Muath Bishawi MD, MPH

Muath Bishawi MD, MPH

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Carmelo Milano MD

Carmelo Milano MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Rachel A. Miller MD

Rachel A. Miller MD

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Stacey A. Maskarinec MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Stacey A. Maskarinec MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence Stacey A. Maskarinec, MD, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, Box 102359, 342 Sands Research Building, Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 July 2020
Citations: 5

Parts of this manuscript were presented at ID Week, October 2019, Washington, DC.

Abstract

Background

Short duration, antimicrobial prophylaxis that includes antistaphylococcal activity is recommended at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation to reduce infection-related complications. There continues to be wide variability in surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens among implantation centers. The aim of this study is to characterize current SIP regimens at different LVAD centers.

Methods

A survey study was conducted from 26 September 2017 to 25 October 2017. Surveys were distributed electronically to LVAD coordinators and infectious diseases specialists at 75 US medical centers identified as having an LVAD program. Data collection included information about antimicrobial selection, duration, Staphylococcus aureus screening, and decolonization procedures.

Results

We received 29 survey responses. The majority of surveys were completed by infectious diseases physicians (72.4% [21 out of 29]). Most responding centers reported LVAD programs established for greater than 10 years (20 out of 29 [69%]). Cardiac transplantation was performed in 28 out of 29 (96%) centers. Of centers reporting a defined SIP regimen for non-penicillin allergic patients (96% [28 out of 29]), 17.9% (5 out of 28) reported a four-drug regimen, 35.7% (10 out of 28) reported a three-drug regimen, and 46.4% (13 out of 28) reported a two-drug regimen, while no centers reported a single-drug regimen. Empiric fluconazole was common (50% [14 out of 28]) and 96.4% (27 out of 28) of regimens included vancomycin. Duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (24 hours to 5 days), S. aureus screening, decolonization procedures, and alterations due to drug allergies varied across participating centers.

Conclusions

Our survey results indicate wide variation in SIP regimens among participating LVAD centers. These results highlight the need for studies evaluating the implications of SIP regimens, and whether clinical factors that prolong antimicrobial duration impact postoperative infection rates.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Dr Milano and Dr Bishawi disclose financial relationships with Medtronic and Abbott Labs. The remaining authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.