Volume 26, Issue 23-24 pp. 4664-4674
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture

Shu-Yuan Lin PhD, RN

Corresponding Author

Shu-Yuan Lin PhD, RN

Associate Professor, Deputy Director

College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Nursing Department, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Correspondence

Shu-Yuan Lin, College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Wei Ting Tseng RN

Wei Ting Tseng RN

Head Nurse

Taipei City Hang-An Nursing Long-term Care Center, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Miao-Ju Hsu PhD

Miao-Ju Hsu PhD

Associate Professor, Chairperson of Department of Physical Therapy

Department of Physical Therapy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Hui-Ying Chiang PhD, RN

Hui-Ying Chiang PhD, RN

Deputy Director, Associate Professor

Nursing Department, Chi Mei Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

Department of Nursing, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Hui-Chen Tseng PhD, RN

Hui-Chen Tseng PhD, RN

Assistant Professor, Supervisor

College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Nursing Department, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 March 2017
Citations: 10

Funding information

This work was funded by National Science Council (NSC 100-2314-B-037-006).

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale among staff in long-term care facilities.

Background

The Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale is a standard tool for safety culture assessment in nursing homes. Extending its application to different types of long-term care facilities and varied ethnic populations is worth pursuing.

Design

A national random survey.

Methods

A total of 306 managers and staff completed the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale among 30 long-term care facilities in Taiwan. Content validity and construct validity were tested by content validity index (CVI) and principal axis factor analysis (PAF) with Promax rotation. Concurrent validity was tested through correlations between the scale and two overall rating items. Reliability was computed by intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficients. Statistical analyses such as descriptive, Pearson's and Spearman's rho correlations and PAF were completed.

Results

Scale-level and item-level CVIs (0.91–0.98) of the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale were satisfactory. Four-factor construct and merged item composition differed from the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale, and it accounted for 53% of variance. Concurrent validity was evident by existing positive correlations between the scale and two overall ratings of resident safety. Cronbach's α coefficients of the subscales and the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale ranged from .76–.94.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale identified essential dimensions to reflect the important features of a patient safety culture in long-term care facilities. The researchers introduced the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture for safety culture assessment in long-term care facilities, but further testing of the reliability of the scale in a large Chinese sample and in different long-term care facilities was recommended.

Relevance to clinical practice

The Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale was developed to increase the users’ intention towards safety culture assessment. It can identify areas for improvement, understand safety culture changes over time and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.