Volume 23, Issue 11-12 pp. 1461-1475
Review

The effectiveness of different concentrations of chlorhexidine for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis

Ting-Ting Zhang BSN

Ting-Ting Zhang BSN

Masters Candidate

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Shan-Shan Tang BSN

Shan-Shan Tang BSN

Masters Candidate

School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Li-Juan Fu RN, MBA

Corresponding Author

Li-Juan Fu RN, MBA

Professor of Nursing

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Correspondence: Li-Juan Fu, Professor of Nursing, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Dongfang Rd #1678, Pudong, Shanghai 200127, China. Telephone: +86 021 38626896.

E-mail:[email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 August 2013
Citations: 40

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia and explore the preferred concentration of chlorhexidine.

Background

The implementation of effective oral care measures could reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, but among several randomised controlled trials, whether using chlorhexidine is effective and which concentration is more appropriate remain controversial.

Design

A meta-analysis was conducted.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China Biology Medicine disc and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure to collect randomised controlled trials of mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving oral care with chlorhexidine to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. The quality of randomised controlled trials was critically appraised, data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and disagreement was resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses were conducted for the eligible randomised controlled trials by revman 5.1. Relative risks and 95% CIs were calculated with the Mantel–Haenszel model, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test.

Results

Eighteen randomised controlled trials were included and a meta-analysis was used. All studies indicated chlorhexidine could significantly prevent and reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia [RR = 0·59, 95% CI (0·50–0·69), p < 0·00001]. Nine studies showed 0·12% chlorhexidine had a significant effect [RR = 0·53, 95% CI (0·43–0·67), < 0·00001]. Three studies proved the effect of the 2% chlorhexidine on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia [RR = 0·55, 95% CI (0·37–0·81), p = 0·002].

Conclusion

Chlorhexidine can prevent and reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chlorhexidine of 0·12% has the best effect on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia according to the meta-analysis, cost analysis, adverse reactions and drug resistance analysis.

Relevance to clinical practice

Ventilator-associated pneumonia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit, and implementing effective oral care can reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chlorhexidine of 0·12% is recommended in our study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.