Effects of different preprocessing algorithms on the prognostic value of breast tumour microscopic images
D. KOLAREVIĆ
Daily Chemotherapy Hospital, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorT. VUJASINOVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorK. KANJER
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorJ. MILOVANOVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorN. TODOROVIĆ-RAKOVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorD. NIKOLIĆ-VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
M. RADULOVIC
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Correspondence to: Marko Radulovic, Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology, Pasterova 14, Belgrade 11000, Serbia. Tel: +381 11 2067 213; fax: +381 11 2067 294; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorD. KOLAREVIĆ
Daily Chemotherapy Hospital, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorT. VUJASINOVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorK. KANJER
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorJ. MILOVANOVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorN. TODOROVIĆ-RAKOVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorD. NIKOLIĆ-VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
M. RADULOVIC
Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia
Correspondence to: Marko Radulovic, Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology, Pasterova 14, Belgrade 11000, Serbia. Tel: +381 11 2067 213; fax: +381 11 2067 294; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSummary
The purpose of this study was to improve the prognostic value of tumour histopathology image analysis methodology by image preprocessing.
Key image qualities were modified including contrast, sharpness and brightness. The texture information was subsequently extracted from images of haematoxylin/eosin-stained tumour tissue sections by GLCM, monofractal and multifractal algorithms without any analytical limitation to predefined structures. Images were derived from patient groups with invasive breast carcinoma (BC, 93 patients) and inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC, 51 patients).
The prognostic performance was indeed significantly enhanced by preprocessing with the average AUCs of individual texture features improving from 0.68 ± 0.05 for original to 0.78 ± 0.01 for preprocessed images in the BC group and 0.75 ± 0.01 to 0.80 ± 0.02 in the IBC group. Image preprocessing also improved the prognostic independence of texture features as indicated by multivariate analysis. Surprisingly, the tonal histogram compression by the nonnormalisation preprocessing has prognostically outperformed the tested contrast normalisation algorithms. Generally, features without prognostic value showed higher susceptibility to prognostic enhancement by preprocessing whereas IDM texture feature was exceptionally susceptible. The obtained results are suggestive of the existence of distinct texture prognostic clues in the two examined types of breast cancer. The obtained enhancement of prognostic performance is essential for the anticipated clinical use of this method as a simple and cost-effective prognosticator of cancer outcome.
References
- Bejnordi, B.E., Litjens, G., Timofeeva, N., Otte-Holler, I., Homeyer, A., Karssemeijer, N. & van der Laak, J.A. (2016) Stain specific standardization of whole-slide histopathological images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 35, 404–415.
- Berry, D.A., Cronin, K.A., Plevritis, S.K. et al. (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1784–1792.
- Buyse, M., Loi, S., van't Veer, L. et al. (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98, 1183–1192.
- Camp, R.L., Dolled-Filhart, M. & Rimm, D. L. (2004) X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 7252–7259.
- Carlsson, A., Wingren, C., Kristensson, M. et al. (2011) Molecular serum portraits in patients with primary breast cancer predict the development of distant metastases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 14252–14257.
- Chen, J.M., Qu, A.P., Wang, L.W. et al. (2015) New breast cancer prognostic factors identified by computer-aided image analysis of HE stained histopathology images. Sci. Rep. 5, 10690.
- Dai, X., Li, Y., Bai, Z. & Tang, X.Q. (2015) Molecular portraits revealing the heterogeneity of breast tumor subtypes defined using immunohistochemistry markers. Sci. Rep. 5, 14499.
- Diessner, J., Wischnewsky, M., Blettner, M. et al. (2016) Do patients with luminal a breast cancer profit from adjuvant systemic therapy? A retrospective multicenter study. PloS One 11, e0168730.
- Dundar, M.M., Badve, S., Bilgin, G., Raykar, V., Jain, R., Sertel, O. & Gurcan, M.N. (2011) Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 1977–1984.
- Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 7, 1–26.
- Fabrizii, M., Moinfar, F., Jelinek, H.F., Karperien, A. & Ahammer, H. (2014) Fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. PloS One 9, e108457.
- Gonzalez, R. & Woods, R. (2007) Digital Image Processing. 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
- Haralick, R., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I.H. (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transact. Syst., Man Cybernet. SMC-3, 610–621.
10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 Google Scholar
- Harbeck, N., Thomssen, C. & Gnant, M. (2013) St. Gallen 2013: brief preliminary summary of the consensus discussion. Breast Care (Basel) 8, 102–109.
- Jackisch, C., Harbeck, N., Huober, J. et al. (2015) 14th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2015: evidence, controversies, consensus – primary therapy of early breast cancer: opinions expressed by German experts. Breast Care (Basel) 10, 211–219.
- Jia, X., Sun, Y. & Wang, B. (2014) Gray level entropy matrix is a superior predictor than multiplex ELISA in the detection of reactive stroma and metastatic potential of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma. IUBMB Life 66, 847–853.
- Justice, A.C., Covinsky, K.E. & Berlin, J.A. (1999) Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann. Internal Med. 130, 515–524.
- Kolarevic, D., Tomasevic, Z., Dzodic, R., Kanjer, K., Vukosavljevic, D.N. & Radulovic, M. (2015) Early prognosis of metastasis risk in inflammatory breast cancer by texture analysis of tumour microscopic images. Biomed. Microdev. 17, 92.
- Li, X. & Plataniotis, K.N. (2015) A complete color normalization approach to histopathology images using color cues computed from saturation-weighted statistics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 1862–1873.
- Metze, K. (2013) Fractal dimension of chromatin: potential molecular diagnostic applications for cancer prognosis. Expert Rev. Molec. Diagnost. 13, 719–735.
- Mezheyeuski, A., Hrynchyk, I., Karlberg, M. et al. (2016) Image analysis-derived metrics of histomorphological complexity predicts prognosis and treatment response in stage II-III colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 36149.
- Moons, K.G., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D.E. & Altman, D.G. (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ. 338, b375.
- Olsson, N., Carlsson, P., James, P. et al. (2013) Grading breast cancer tissues using molecular portraits. Mole. Cell. Proteom. 12, 3612–3623.
- Perou, C.M., Sorlie, T., Eisen, M.B. et al. (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406, 747–752.
- Prat, A. & Perou, C.M. (2011) Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Molec. Oncol. 5, 5–23.
- Pribic, J., Vasiljevic, J., Kanjer, K., Konstantinovic, Z.N., Milosevic, N.T., Vukosavljevic, D.N. & Radulovic, M. (2015) Fractal dimension and lacunarity of tumor microscopic images as prognostic indicators of clinical outcome in early breast cancer. Biomark. Med. 9, 1279–1277.
- Rajkovic, N., Kolarevic, D., Kanjer, K., Milosevic, N.T., Nikolic-Vukosavljevic, D. & Radulovic, M. (2016a) Comparison of monofractal, multifractal and gray level co-occurrence matrix algorithms in analysis of Breast tumor microscopic images for prognosis of distant metastasis risk. Biomed. Microdev. 18, 83.
- Rajkovic, N., Vujasinovic, T., Kanjer, K., Milosevic, N.T., Nikolic-Vukosavljevic, D. & Radulovic, M. (2016b) Prognostic biomarker value of binary and grayscale breast tumor histopathology images. Biomar. Med. 10, 1049–1059.
- Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E. et al. (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Meth. 9, 676–682.
- Tambasco, M., Eliasziw, M. & Magliocco, A.M. (2010) Morphologic complexity of epithelial architecture for predicting invasive breast cancer survival. J. Transl. Med. 8, 140.
- Tambasco, M. & Magliocco, A.M. (2008) Relationship between tumor grade and computed architectural complexity in breast cancer specimens. Hum. Pathol. 39, 740–746.
- Torre, L.A., Bray, F., Siegel, R.L., Ferlay, J., Lortet-Tieulent, J. & Jemal, A. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 65, 87–108.
- Vahadane, A., Peng, T., Sethi, A. et al. (2016) Structure-preserving color normalization and sparse stain separation for histological images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 35, 1962–1971.
- Veta, M., van Diest, P.J., Kornegoor, R., Huisman, A., Viergever, M.A. & Pluim, J.P. (2013) Automatic nuclei segmentation in H&E stained breast cancer histopathology images. PloS One 8, e70221.
- Vujasinovic, T., Pribic, J., Kanjer, K. et al. (2015a) Gray-level co-occurrence matrix texture analysis of breast tumor images in prognosis of distant metastasis risk. Microsc. Microanal. 21, 646–654.
- Vujasinovic, T., Pribic, J., Kanjer, K., Milosevic, N.T., Tomasevic, Z., Milovanovic, Z., Nikolic-Vukosavljevic, D. & Radulovic, M. (2015b) Gray-level co-occurrence matrix texture analysis of breast tumor images in prognosis of distant metastasis risk. Microsc. Microanal. 21, 646–654.
- Wang, X.C., Li, X.F., Fang, B.R. et al. (2013) Repair of defects in lower extremities with peroneal perforator-based sural neurofasciocutaneous flaps. Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chin. J. Burns 29, 432–435.
- Weigelt, B., Geyer, F.C. & Reis-Filho, J.S. (2010) Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they? Molec. Oncol. 4, 192–208.
- Yuan, Y., Failmezger, H., Rueda, O.M. et al. (2012) Quantitative image analysis of cellular heterogeneity in breast tumors complements genomic profiling. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 157ra143.
- Zuiderveld, K. (1994) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. Graphics gems IV (ed. by S.H. Paul). Academic Press Professional, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
10.1016/B978-0-12-336156-1.50061-6 Google Scholar