Volume 58, Issue 11 pp. 1015-1031
Mental health

The role of personality in aggressive behaviour among individuals with intellectual disabilities

L. S. Chaïb

Corresponding Author

L. S. Chaïb

Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Département de Psychologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence: Mr Laurent Stephane Chaïb, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 Lasalle Blvd, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4H 1R3 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
A. G. Crocker

A. G. Crocker

Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 May 2013
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

Aggressive behaviour is associated with certain personality traits in both the general population and among individuals with mental health problems, but little attention has been paid to the relationship between aggressive behaviour and personality among individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). The aim of this study was to circumscribe personality profiles associated with aggressive behaviour among individuals with ID.

Method

In this cross-sectional study of 296 adults with mild or moderate ID, information on mental health, personality and aggressive behaviour was gathered through structured interviews with the ID participants and their case manager, and a review of client files.

Results

The results of the Reiss Profile were submitted to hierarchical cluster analysis method. Subsequently, the distribution of aggressive behaviour, sociodemographic characteristics and clinical characteristics across personality profiles was analysed. The analyses yielded seven distinct personality profiles in relation to patterns of aggressive behaviour: Pacifists, Socials, Confidents, Altruists, Conformists, Emotionals and Asocials.

Conclusion

The identification of distinct personality profiles sheds light on the risk factors for aggressive behaviour, and suggests new approaches to improving diagnostic and intervention strategies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.