Volume 34, Issue 1 pp. 147-153
Gastroenterology

Pediatric Elective Diagnostic Procedure Complications: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis

Thomas M Attard

Corresponding Author

Thomas M Attard

Department of Gastroenterology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas, USA

Correspondence

Thomas M Attard, Department of Gastroenterology, Children's Mercy Hospital, 1MO2.37; 2401 Gilham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Mikaela Miller

Mikaela Miller

Clinical Decision Support, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Lee

Brian Lee

Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas W Champion

Thomas W Champion

Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mike Thomson

Mike Thomson

Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 June 2018
Citations: 6
Declaration of conflict of interest: All authors declare that they do not have any potential source of conflict of interest, financial, or otherwise.

Abstract

Background and Aim

Increased access to endoscopic procedures have entrenched these investigative tools in routine pediatric gastroenterology practice. Patient outcomes following endoscopy therefore are topical in the decision toward endoscopy. We studied the likelihood and patient characteristics of children admitted following ambulatory endoscopy.

Methods

Hospitalization data were obtained from the Pediatric Hospital Information System including 49 tertiary children's hospitals in the USA. Children who underwent ambulatory diagnostic endoscopy between October 1, 2005 and September 25, 2015 were included. The primary outcomes were post-procedure events resulting in unplanned admission (not for inflammatory bowel disease management) or emergency room visit within 5 days. Unadjusted, univariate analyses were followed by multivariable analysis of the associations between patient characteristics and outcome using the R statistical package, v. 3.2.3.

Results

During the study period, 217 817 patients underwent diagnostic endoscopy; 101 (0.05%) patients were admitted directly; 1314 (0.60%) were admitted to the same facility's emergency department with either a respiratory or a gastrointestinal complication as a primary diagnosis within 5 days. None of the procedures resulted in death; female patients were more likely to experience adverse outcomes (P < 0.001), as were patients from an urban setting (P = 0.0004), whereas White, non-Hispanic patients were less likely to represent (P < 0.0001). Patients with chronic comorbidities were more likely to experience complications. The most frequent diagnoses at admission were abdominal pain (30.5%), other gastroenterologic processes (26.8%), respiratory disorders (17.1%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (8.3%), and fever (4.5%).

Conclusions

Ambulatory pediatric endoscopy is safe; significant adverse outcomes are rare but more likely in female, non-White or Hispanic patients and in patients with significant chronic comorbidities.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.