Volume 149, Issue 6 pp. 988-995
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Full Access

DNA Barcoding Reveals Taxonomic Insights Into Pest Species of Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) on Fruit Trees in South Korea

Hwalran Choi

Hwalran Choi

Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Sun-Kook Kim

Sun-Kook Kim

Agricultural Research Institute Grape Research Institute, Yeongdong, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea

Contribution: ​Investigation, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Duane D. McKenna

Duane D. McKenna

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
Seunghwan Lee

Corresponding Author

Seunghwan Lee

Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence:

Seunghwan Lee ([email protected])

Contribution: Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 March 2025
Citations: 1

ABSTRACT

Severe leafhopper pests infesting fruit trees (apricot, grape, peach, persimmon and plum) in South Korea were investigated. DNA barcoding using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (COI) sequences identified four Typhlocybinae species: Arboridia kakogawana and Arboridia maculifrons on grape, Singapora shinshana on Prunus trees and Zorka sp. on persimmon, spanning both nymphal and adult life stages. Notably, DNA barcoding revealed phylogenetically relevant colour variation among adult specimens of the grape pest, A. kakogawana. This study presents, for the first time, live nymphal and adult photographs alongside neighbour-joining trees, host plant associations and updated DNA barcode sequences for these Korean leafhoppers, which have not previously been included in global datasets.

1 Introduction

Leafhoppers (Family Cicadellidae), a diverse group of Hemipteran insects comprising approximately 22,000 species worldwide (Dietrich 2004), exhibit notable traits such as varied colouration, jumping behaviour, variation in life cycle and host plant adaptability, making them valuable bioindicators. Moreover, many species are significant agricultural pests and vectors of phytopathogenic viruses, posing substantial economic threats (Ishii et al. 2013). Particularly in fruit crops, the damage caused by leafhoppers is recognised as a global issue. For example, Zonocyba pomaria (McAtee 1926) (white apple leafhopper) is the most common serious pest in various fruit trees, particularly apple trees, and its damage has been monitored since 1938 (Steiner 1938; EPPO 2024). It feeds on the undersides of leaves, causing whitish spots on the leaf surfaces. Scaphoideus titanus Ball 1932 (American grapevine leafhopper) is another significant pest of vineyards in North America and Europe, primarily due to its role in transmitting Flavescence dorée, a serious phytoplasma disease. The pest damages vines by feeding on sap and spreading this pathogen, which leads to symptoms such as delayed bud break, yellowing or reddening of leaves, reduced photosynthesis and up to a 50% reduction in grape yields (Ripamonti et al. 2022). Early detection and control of nymphs are crucial to prevent the spread of the disease, as adult leafhoppers are highly effective vectors.

Species identification of leafhoppers has historically been challenging due to their small size, morphological ambiguities in nymphs, seasonal phenotypic plasticity and the need for detailed examination of male genitalia (Zhang, Zhang, and Duan 2019; EFSA et al. 2022). To overcome these challenges, DNA barcoding using the COI gene has become essential (Bluemel et al. 2011; Kamitani 2011; Foottit, Maw, and Hebert 2014; Zhang, Zhang, and Duan 2019). Initial efforts by Kamitani (2011) and Bluemel et al. (2011) provided foundational DNA barcodes, while Foottit, Maw, and Hebert (2014) expanded this dataset to include 471 Hemipteran species. Recent studies by Zhang, Zhang, and Duan (2019) and Emam et al. (2020) have further enriched global DNA barcode databases, and Lu et al. (2021) conducted a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Typhlocybinae, focusing on COI barcodes.

Nonetheless, previous surveys primarily focused on adult or museum specimens, with limited coverage of nymphs, particularly from the subfamily Typhlocybinae. Early developmental stages of leafhoppers, including nymphs, are equally as damaging to crops as adults (Hower and Flinn 1986; Jarrell et al. 2020). Furthermore, colour variations observed in adult leafhoppers (Ramaiah, Meshram, and Dey 2023) complicate accurate identification of live specimens.

In the Korean Peninsula, about one hundred leafhopper species across thirty-five genera have been recorded in the subfamily Typhlocybinae. Since 2005, severe outbreaks of leafhoppers have been reported in fruit trees and vines, affecting crops such as Vitis vinifera Linnaeus (1753) (grapes), Prunus spp. Linnaeus (1753) (apricot, peach and plum) and Diospyros kaki Thunberg (1784) (persimmon) (Ahn et al. 2005). Notably, the genus Arboridia is distributed in Palaearctic and Oriental regions, with 69 valid species, and ten species have been recorded in Korea (Song and Li 2013; Oh, Choe, and Jung 2015). Arboridia spp. are prominent pests of grapevines, particularly V. vinifera. However, difficulties in identifying Arboridia species, especially at the nymph stage, have hindered early management efforts.

The genus Singapora, primarily distributed across Central Asia and Oriental regions, includes 18 recorded species (Cao, Yang, and Zhang 2014). It is known to infest plants of the Rosaceae family. Singapora shinshana (Matsumura 1932) is the only species from this genus recorded in Korea, where it attacks various orchard trees, particularly Prunus species (Kim et al. 2021). Due to the diversity of host plants within the Prunus genus, genetic studies are needed to clarify its population structure based on host plant associations.

Diospyros kaki (persimmon), originally a fruit tree from China, is now widely cultivated in Korea and Japan. No reports exist of leafhopper species affecting this crop in China or Japan. However, since 2008, Zorka sp. has been reported in Korea as damaging persimmon leaves, causing serious harm, and it continues to affect persimmon crops (Hwang et al. 2009). The genus Zorka is known from the Oriental region, with species primarily recorded in Vietnam and southern China (Huang and Zhang 2013). In Korea, only Zorka sp. has been recorded from this genus.

In this study, we monitored orchard farms in South Korea for leafhopper pests, focusing on both nymphs and adults to facilitate early control. Our approach evaluates the utility of DNA barcoding for matching nymphs and adults, includes photographs of live specimens, reports host plant associations and provides the first DNA barcode sequences for these economically important Korean leafhopper species.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Taxon Sampling and Morphological Identification

Leafhopper samples were collected from seven localities across South Korea (Table 1). All areas, including open fields and test sites, were orchards in which the crops were grown under natural conditions, without pest control measures applied.

TABLE 1. List of Korean leafhopper specimens, collecting informantion and Genbank accession numbers.
Species name Habitat Status Sample No. Collecting location Sequence no. Genbank no.
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 130,724-HR-31-1 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 695 MN972661
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 130,724-HR-31-1 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 696 MN972662
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 130,724-HR-31-2 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 697 MN972668
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 130825HR-1 GW, Chuncheonsi 735 MN972666
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Nymph 130825HR-1 GW, Chuncheonsi 736 MN972664
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Nymph 130825HR-1 GW, Chuncheonsi 739 MN972674
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 131,001-HR-1 GG, National institute of horticultural & Herbal science 766 MN972669
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 131,001-HR-1 GG, National institute of horticultural & Herbal science 767 MN972665
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 131,001-HR-1 GG, National institute of horticultural & Herbal science 768 MN972667
Arboridia kakogawana Vitis vinifera Adult 131,001-HR-1 GG, National institute of horticultural & Herbal science 769 MN972663
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Adult 20110725HR-10 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 689 MN972654
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Adult 20110725HR-10 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 690 MN972655
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Adult 20,111,103 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 693 MN972660
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Adult 20120723HR6 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 694 MN972659
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Nymph 130,724-HR-30 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 699 MN972658
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Adult 130,724-HR-30 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 700 MN972657
Arboridia maculifrons Vitis vinifera Adult 130,724-HR-30 CB, Provincial Agricultural Research & Extention Service 701 MN972656
Singapora shinshana Prunus armeniaca Nymph 130907HR-3 GG, Yangpyeonggun 737 MN972670
Singapora shinshana Prunus armeniaca Adult 130907HR-3 GG, Yangpyeonggun 738 MN972673
Singapora shinshana Prunus salicina Adult 130918HR-4 GW, Chuncheonsi 757 MN972675
Singapora shinshana Prunus salicina Adult 130918HR-4 GW, Chuncheonsi 758 MN972671
Singapora shinshana Prunus salicina Adult 130918HR-4 GW, Chuncheonsi 759 MN972680
Singapora shinshana Prunus salicina Adult 130918HR-4 GW, Chuncheonsi 760 MN972672
Singapora shinshana Prunus persica Adult 130918HR-6 Incheon, China town 762 MN972678
Singapora shinshana Prunus persica Adult 130918HR-6 Incheon, China town 763 MN972676
Singapora shinshana Prunus persica Adult 130918HR-6 Incheon, China town 764 MN972677
Singapora shinshana Prunus persica Adult 130918HR-6 Incheon, China town 765 MN972679
Zorka sp. Diospyros kaki Adult 130918HR-5 GW, Donghaesi 761 MN972681
Zorka sp. Diospyros kaki Adult 20,120,723-HR-10 CN, Boryeongsi 782 MN972682
Zorka sp. Diospyros kaki Nymph 20,120,723-HR-10 CN, Boryeongsi 783 MN972683

For the collecting location, provincial abbreviations are as follows: CB, Chungcheongbuk-do; CN, Chungcheongnam-do; GW, Gangwon-do; GG, Gyeonggi-do. Live photographs were taken to document colour variations and to match nymphs with adult forms. The number of adults and nymphs used for the extraction is as follows: A. kakogawana (8 adults, 2 nymphs), A. maculifrons (7 adults, 1 nymph), Singapora shinshana (9 adults, 1 nymph) and Zorka sp. (2 adults, 1 nymph).

Adult specimens were morphologically identified using a taxonomic key, focused on male genitalia (Huang and Zhang 2013; Song and Li 2013). Voucher specimens, excluding genitalia, were preserved in 90% ethanol, and genomic DNA samples were extracted and stored at −20°C. All samples and voucher specimens are housed in the insect collection of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, South Korea.

2.2 DNA Extraction, Amplification, Sequence Alignment and Data Analyses

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). PCR amplification of the partial mitochondrial COI gene was performed using AccuPower PCR PreMix with the primer pair LCO1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCA TAAAGATATTGG-3′)/HCO2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′; Folmer et al. 1994) and a 20 μL amplification reaction. PCR conditions consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 45°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were verified by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Inc.).

Raw COI raw sequences were examined and joined into contigs using SeqMan II (version 7.0.1, 2007; DNAstar Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Sequence alignments were performed using MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2005; Katoh and Toh 2008) with default settings on the online server (ver. 7; https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/). Pairwise divergence, numbers of substitutions and model test of COI sequences were calculated using MEGA 11 (Tamura, Stecher, and Kumar 2021).

While the GTR+G+I model exhibited the lowest BIC during model testing using Mega 11, the Kimura two-parameter (K2P) model demonstrated the best performance when constructing the NJ tree at the species level. To incorporate the previously used outgroups, aligned sequences were used to generate a neighbour-joining (NJ) tree with the Kimura two-parameter (K2P) model and 1000 bootstrap replications (Hebert et al. 2003; Foottit, Maw, and Hebert 2014).

The outgroup was selected from a total of 10 individuals within the family Cicadellidae, obtained from NCBI, along with one species from our own dataset. This selection includes species recognised as pests on a global scale (HQ929059.1 Macrosteles quadrilineatus; MF939058.1 Empoasca fabae; HQ928991.1 Empoasca fabae; MF831122.1 Macrosteles quadrilineatus; HQ929057.1 Macrosteles quadrilineatus; HM462269.1 Circulifer tenellus; MW324541.1 Eurhadina pulchella; JX020552.1 Typhlocyba serrata; KY264055.1 Homalodisca lacerta; MN972684 Cicadellidae sp.). The number of haplotypes and haplotype diversity within each species was calculated using DnaSP v5 (Librado and Rozas 2009).

3 Results

A total of 40 barcode sequences were generated for leafhopper species, and 30 individuals of Korean leafhopper species were successfully amplified and sequenced using universal COI primers. Among these, four leafhopper species from three genera within the subfamily Typhlocybinae were identified: Arboridia kakogawana, A. maculifrons, Singapora shinshana and Zorka sp. The sequences were deposited in NCBI (USA) under Accession Numbers MN972661-MN972679.

Partial neighbour-joining trees, based on Kimura 2-parameter genetic distances, are presented in Figure 1. The trees delineate the leafhoppers into four main clusters with robust bootstrap support (Figure 1). Genetic distances, both intraspecific and interspecific, are provided in Tables 2 and 3. Intraspecific genetic distances among the four species ranged from 0.00% to 2.10%, while pairwise mean genetic distances between species ranged from 15.90% to 26.00%. These values indicate a significant barcoding gap and align with previously reported values for the family Cicadellidae (Foottit, Maw, and Hebert 2014; Zhang, Zhang, and Duan 2019). In prior barcoding studies on Hemiptera, intraspecific distances generally fell below 2%, while interspecific distances exceeded 3% (Hebert et al. 2003; Park et al. 2011). Our results largely support these findings, with the exception of a slightly higher intraspecific genetic distance (0.00%–2.10%). However, Zhang, Zhang, and Duan (2019) reported greater intraspecific divergence within the species of Deltocephalus (Cicadellidae), ranging from 0.6% to 6.3%, indicating that genetic distance may vary depending on the species.

Details are in the caption following the image
Partial neighbour-joining trees based on Kimura 2-parameter genetic distances. More than 50% bootstrap support values are shown at each node. Letters in photos indicate life stages: Arboridia kakogawana (A; nymph, B, C and D; adults), A. maculifrons (E; nymph, F; adult), Singapora shinshana (G; nymph, H; adult), Zorka sp. (I; nymph, J; adult). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
TABLE 2. Pairwise mean genetic distance (K2P) between species within the family Cicadellidae (below the diagonal is the genetic distance and above the diagonal represents the SEM).
Arboridia maculifrons Arboridia kakogawana Singapora shinshana Zorka sp.
A. maculifrons 0.005 0.005 0.004
A. kakogawana 0.159 0.003 0.003
S. shinshana 0.201 0.214 0.000
Z. sp. 0.260 0.254 0.226
TABLE 3. Number of haplotypes and haplotype diversity, and the intraspecific genetic distance for each species.
Species No. of individuals (n) No. of haplotypes (h) Haplotype diversity (Hd) Intraspecific genetic distance (mean) Intraspecific genetic distance (min–max)
A. maculifrons 7 5 0.857 0.008 0.000–0.021
A. kakogawana 9 8 0.972 0.005 0.000–0.013
S. shinshana 11 1 0.000 0.000 0.000–0.000
Z. sp. 3 2 0.667 0.004 0.000–0.006

The number of haplotypes identified for each species was 5, 8, 1 and 2 for A. maculifrons, A. kakogawana, Singapora shinshana and Zorka sp., respectively. Haplotype diversity was calculated as 0.857, 0.972, 0.000 and 0.667 for A. maculifrons, A. kakogawana, Singapora shinshana and Zorka sp., respectively.

4 Discussion

The genus Arboridia Zachvatkin 1946, belongs to the leafhopper subfamily Typhlocybinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), comprising 84 species recorded across the Palaearctic and Oriental regions, including several recognised as global pests (Han et al. 2024). Arboridia kakogawana, a significant pest of grapevine (Vitis vinifera), is listed on the EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) alert list (EPPO 2024) and has been associated with documented damage in Korea since 2005 (Ahn et al. 2005). Both A. kakogawana and A. maculifrons are prominent pests of cultivated grapevines in Korea, found in both nymph and adult forms (Ahn et al. 2005). A. kakogawana exhibits notable colour variation and intraspecific diversity, complicating accurate identification (EFSA et al. 2022).

Adult A. kakogawana typically display pale yellow bodies with orange or brown venation on the forewings and two black spots at the upper angles of the scutellum (Šćiban, Mirić, and Kosovac 2021). However, these venational patterns and spots vary with maturity, leading to potential misidentification. For example, adult form 1 in Figure 2 lacks venation patterns and black scutellum spots, while form 2 displays the spots but not the venation. Adult form 3 exhibits both features, resembling A. maculifrons. Taxonomic differentiation between A. kakogawana and A. maculifrons primarily relies on the length of male genitalia.

Details are in the caption following the image
Live photographs of Arboridia kakogawana; Adult form 1, 2 and 3. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Our neighbour-joining (NJ) tree (Figure 1) distinctly clusters nymph and adult specimens of both species, facilitating accurate identification. Although A. kakogawana and A. maculifrons belong to the same genus, the interspecific genetic distance between them was 15.9% (Table 2), contrasting with the 4%–10% interspecific distances typically observed in closely related congeneric species (Park et al. 2011; Barman et al. 2017). Intraspecific genetic distances also differed between the two species: for A. kakogawana, distances ranged from 0.00% to 1.30%, with a mean of 0.50%, while A. maculifrons showed a range of 0.00%–2.10% and a mean of 0.80% (Table 3), indicating deeper genetic divergence in A. maculifrons.

Arboridia kakogawana exhibited the highest number of haplotypes and the greatest haplotype diversity among the four species studied (Table 3), likely due to sample collection from multiple regions (CB, GG, GW), suggesting that regional differences have influenced its haplotype diversity. Furthermore, more than 15% genetic divergence exists within a single genus, Arboridia, suggesting the possibility of cryptic species (Hebert et al. 2004). This highlights the need for further studies, such as securing additional Arboridia species and conducting a comprehensive phylogenetic study of the genus Arboridia.

The genus Zorka Dworakowska, 1970, also in the subfamily Typhlocybinae, includes eight recognised species worldwide (Huang and Zhang 2013). Zorka sp., a newly discovered species in Korea, was found on persimmon trees (Hwang et al. 2009) and exhibits host plant specificity, not co-occurring with other leafhopper species. This Korean species differs from existing Zorka species by the pattern of white spots on the crown, pronotum, scutellum and forewings.

Both nymph and adult forms of Zorka sp. cluster together in the NJ tree (Figure 1 I, J), clearly separated from other leafhopper species. Zorka sp. exhibited the greatest pairwise mean genetic distance with A. maculifrons, at 26.0% (Table 2). Its intraspecific genetic distance ranged from 0.00% to 0.60%, with a mean of 0.40%, which falls within the typical range (< 2%) (Table 3). The number of haplotypes and haplotype diversity were 2 and 0.667, respectively. These results suggest that regional differences, as indicated by samples collected from CN and GW, have influenced haplotype diversity (Table 3).

In contrast to Arboridia spp. and Zorka sp., Singapora shinshana inhabits various fruit trees in the genus Prunus (e.g., P. armeniaca, P. salicina, P. persica) in Korea (Table 1). Samples from different host plants clustered together in the NJ tree (Figure 1). The pairwise mean genetic distance between Singapora shinshana and Zorka sp. was 22.6% (Table 2). The intraspecific genetic distance for S. shinshana was 0.00% (Table 3), the lowest among the species studied. Moreover, only a single haplotype was observed in S. shinshana in Korea, suggesting low genetic diversity, despite its occurrence on multiple Prunus hosts (Table 3).

5 Conclusions

This study presents newly reported DNA barcodes for Korean leafhopper species: Arboridia kakogawana, A. maculifrons, Singapora shinshana and Zorka sp. The findings confirm that DNA barcoding is an effective tool for identifying leafhoppers across their life stages. Further research is recommended to expand COI data coverage for more precise species identification.

Early detection and accurate identification of nymphs could improve pest control and monitoring efforts, particularly in the early stages, thereby supporting increased crop production.

Author Contributions

Hwalran Choi: conceptualization, writing – original draft, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Sun-Kook Kim: investigation, resources. Duane D. McKenna: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft. Seunghwan Lee: funding acquisition, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202402202). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2024-004057 51).

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    Data Availability Statement

    All sequence data generated from this study are available from the NCBI (Accession Numbers MN972661-MN972679).

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.