Volume 48, Issue 3 pp. 455-463
ORIGINAL ARTICLE IMPLANT DENTISTRY

Prevalence and risk/protective indicators of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around dental implants

Mario Romandini

Corresponding Author

Mario Romandini

Section of Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence

Mario Romandini, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Odontología, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ignacio Pedrinaci

Ignacio Pedrinaci

Section of Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Cristina Lima

Cristina Lima

Section of Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Costanza Soldini

Maria Costanza Soldini

Department of Periodontology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ana Araoz

Ana Araoz

Section of Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Mariano Sanz

Mariano Sanz

Section of Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 December 2020
Citations: 43

Ignacio Pedrinaci and Cristina Lima are Equally contributed.

Funding information

This study was partially funded by the Osteology Foundation through a Young Research Grant to Dr. Mario Romandini (project n. 15-251).

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the prevalence of buccal peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PISTD) in anterior implants and to identify the risk/protective indicators of PISTD in implants not suffering peri-implantitis.

Materials and methods

240 randomly selected patients from a university clinic database were invited to participate in the present cross-sectional study. Those who accepted, after the evaluation of their medical and dental records, were clinically examined to assess the prevalence of buccal PISTD in non-molar implants. Multilevel multivariate logistic regression analyses were then carried out to identify those factors associated either positively (risk) or negatively (protective) with buccal PISTD in implants without peri-implantitis.

Results

92 patients with a total of 272 dental implants were analysed. At implant-level, the prevalence of buccal PISTD was 16.9%, while when selecting only implants without peri-implantitis it was 12.0%. Buccal PISTD was present in 26.7% of the implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis. The following factors were identified as risk/protective indicators of buccal PISTD in implants without peri-implantitis: malposition (too buccal vs. correct: OR=14.67), thin peri-implant phenotype (OR=8.31), presence of at least one adjacent tooth (OR=0.08) and presence of abutment (OR=0.12).

Conclusions

PISTD are highly prevalent among patients with dental implants in this university-based population, and several factors were identified as risk and protective indicators of PISTD in implants not suffering peri-implantitis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.