Volume 48, Issue 5 pp. 721-733
ORIGINAL ARTICLE IMPLANT DENTISTRY

Clinical and histological comparison of the soft tissue morphology between zirconia and titanium dental implants under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions—A randomized controlled clinical trial

Stefan P. Bienz

Stefan P. Bienz

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Monika Hilbe

Monika Hilbe

Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Jürg Hüsler

Jürg Hüsler

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel S. Thoma

Daniel S. Thoma

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Ronald E. Jung

Corresponding Author

Ronald E. Jung

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Correspondence

Ronald E. Jung, Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 December 2020
Citations: 28

Funding information

The study is funded by a grant of the International Team for Implantology (1018-2014). Material support was granted by Straumann Holding AG

Abstract

Objectives

To analyse the soft tissue morphology under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions comparing zirconia and titanium implants.

Methods

Forty-two patients with two adjacent missing teeth received one zirconia (Zr) and one titanium (Ti) implant, with the mesial and distal position randomized. At 3 months, half of the patients were instructed to continue (healthy; h) and the other half to omit (experimental mucositis; m) oral hygiene around the implants for 3 weeks. Clinical parameters were evaluated before and after the experimental phase, and a soft tissue biopsy was harvested. Mixed model analyses were performed to analyse the data.

Results

The plaque control record increased significantly for the two mucositis groups, reaching 68.3 ± 31.9% (mean ± SD) for Zr-m and 75.0 ± 29.4% for Ti-m (p < .0001), being also significantly lower for Zr-m than for Ti-m. Bleeding on probing remained stable in group Zr-m and amounted to 21.7 ± 23.6%, but increased significantly in group Ti-m (p = .040), measuring 32.5 ± 27.8%. The number of inflammatory cells and the length of the junctional epithelium did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Both implants rendered similar outcomes under healthy conditions. Lower plaque and bleeding scores were detected for zirconia implants under experimental mucositis conditions. Histologically, only minimal differences were observed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dres Thoma, Hämmerle and Jung report further grants from the ITI outside of the submitted work. Dres Thoma, Hämmerle, Jung and Bienz report further grants and lecture support from Straumann Holding AG outside of the submitted work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.