Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Review

Open Access

Mesenchymal stem cells in acute lung injury: are they ready for translational medicine?

Corresponding Author

Feng Xu

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Correspondence to: Feng XU, M.D., Ph.D., Assoc Prof, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

Tel.: +86 571 87784583

Fax: +86 571 87784571

E-mail: [email protected]

Xiangdong WANG, MD, PhD, Prof, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Tel.: +86 21 64041990 5420

Fax: +86 21 54961729

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Yue Hu,

Yue Hu

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author

Jiebai Zhou,

Jiebai Zhou

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author

Xiangdong Wang,

Corresponding Author

Xiangdong Wang

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, China

Correspondence to: Feng XU, M.D., Ph.D., Assoc Prof, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

Tel.: +86 571 87784583

Fax: +86 571 87784571

E-mail: [email protected]

Xiangdong WANG, MD, PhD, Prof, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Tel.: +86 21 64041990 5420

Fax: +86 21 54961729

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Feng Xu,

Corresponding Author

Feng Xu

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Correspondence to: Feng XU, M.D., Ph.D., Assoc Prof, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

Tel.: +86 571 87784583

Fax: +86 571 87784571

E-mail: [email protected]

Xiangdong WANG, MD, PhD, Prof, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Tel.: +86 21 64041990 5420

Fax: +86 21 54961729

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Yue Hu,

Yue Hu

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author

Jiebai Zhou,

Jiebai Zhou

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author

Xiangdong Wang,

Corresponding Author

Xiangdong Wang

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, China

Correspondence to: Feng XU, M.D., Ph.D., Assoc Prof, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

Tel.: +86 571 87784583

Fax: +86 571 87784571

E-mail: [email protected]

Xiangdong WANG, MD, PhD, Prof, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Medical School, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Tel.: +86 21 64041990 5420

Fax: +86 21 54961729

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 03 July 2013

https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12063

Citations: 36

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a severe clinical condition responsible for high mortality and the development of multiple organ dysfunctions, because of the lack of specific and effective therapies for ALI. Increasing evidence from pre-clinical studies supports preventive and therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs, also called mesenchymal stromal cells) in ALI/ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome). Therapeutic effects of MSCs were noticed in various delivery approaches (systemic, local, or other locations), multiple origins (bone marrow or other tissues), or different schedules of administrations (before or after the challenges). MSCs could reduce the over-production of inflammatory mediators, leucocyte infiltration, tissue injury and pulmonary failure, and produce a number of benefit factors through interaction with other cells in the process of lung tissue repair. Thus, it is necessary to establish guidelines, standard operating procedures and evaluation criteria for translating MSC-based therapies into clinical application for patients with ALI.

● Introduction

● Complexity of ALI pathogenesis

● Therapeutic properties of MSCs in pre-clinical ALI models

● Potential Mechanisms of MSCs in ALI

– Anti-inflammatory effect

– Immunomodulatory effects

– Reduction in pulmonary oedema

– Clearance of bacteria

– Lung repair

– Microvesicles and mitochondria derived from MSCs

● Effects from MSCs or secondary reactions

● Considerations for translational medicine

Introduction

Acute lung injury (ALI) as a severe pathological condition is characterized clinically by respiratory distress, refractory hypoxemia, and non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. A number of factors could initiate and cause the development of ALI, for example, sepsis, pneumonia, trauma, or aspiration of gastric contents 1, among which sepsis and pneumonia were accounted as the highest risk 2. According to the American-Europe Consensus Criteria Joint Meeting of ALI diagnostic criteria, the annual incidence of ALI was about 78.9/100,000 in the United States in 2005 3. Patients with ALI/ARDS could not recover to normal predicted levels of physical function at 5 years and had greater 5-year costs for the incurrence of coexisting illnesses 4. The mortality of severe sepsis with ALI caused by Gram negative or positive bacterial infection remains high 5, 6.

Efficient and specific therapies for ALI are still demanded because of the poor understanding of pathological mechanisms and limited effects of basic mechanical ventilation, fluid management, drug therapy to improve oxygenation, or other supportive methods 7. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs, also called mesenchymal stromal cells) are currently proposed as a promising cell therapy for ALI, potentially attributed from a number of factors from MSCs via the paracrine and/or autocrine secretion 8-11. This review aims to overview evidence of pre-clinical studies to support the application of MSCs for ALI, especially caused by bacterial infection or their toxins. We emphasized the importance of understanding the complexity of ALI from clinical aspects, molecular mechanisms by which MSCs exert their therapeutic effects and challenges to translate MSC-based therapies to clinical application.

Complexity of ALI pathogenesis

Acute lung injury is characterized by uncontrolled inflammation and dysfunctions of endothelial and epithelial barriers of the lung, the loss of alveolar-capillary membrane integrity, excessive transepithelial leucocyte migration, and overproduction of pro-inflammatory mediators, as explained in Figure 1. The pathogenesis of ALI is more complex than expected. A number of biomarkers related with the lung epithelium and endothelium during the inflammatory and coagulation cascades were proposed to predict the morbidity and mortality of ALI 12. The hyperproduction of inflammatory mediators, for example, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, has been considered as a direct response to injury. Protein C and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 with alterations in coagulation and fibrinolysis are independent predictors of mortality 13. Dysfunction of microvascular endothelial barriers results in the efflux of protein-rich fluid into interstitial tissue and distal airspaces of the lung, accompanied by increased release of von Willebrand factor and overexpression of intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1. In addition to the impairment pulmonary epithelial cells, for example, pneumocytes I and II, airway epithelial cells were also considered as the initiating and secondary reacting cells responsible for the development of acute lung inflammation and injury 14. Recent studies also demonstrated that chemokines and their receptors play a dominant role in the initiation of leucocyte recruitment and lung inflammation 15. Of multiple molecular mechanisms, the intracellular signal pathways like phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-involved pathway have been suggested to control the signal transduction from the cellular membrane to the nuclei and regulate hyper-inflammatory responses of both leucocytes and epithelial cells 16.

Details are in the caption following the image — **Figure 1**
Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

The pathogenesis of acute lung injury (ALI) is more complex than expected, which is characterized by uncontrolled inflammation and dysfunctions of endothelial and epithelial barriers of the lung.

Severe bacterial infection is recognized as the primary cause of ALI development, and the infected bacteria have been detected to release ciliary toxins, pneumolysin, endotoxin and IgA proteases, which compromise mucociliary clearance and activate dendritic cells, alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells through toll-like receptors (TLRs) to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns of the bacteria. Those activated cells could further produce a number of inflammatory mediators, for example, growth factors, chemokines, adhesion molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-8 and TNF-α through nuclear factor (NF)-κB 17-19. The bacteria-specific inflammation could simultaneously maintain host immune competence and facilitate repair.

Therapeutic potentials of MSCs in ALI

Mesenchymal stem cells, discovered as adult multipotent cells in 1968 20, are capable of self-renewing and differentiating into mesenchymal lineages, like chondrocytes, osteocytes or adipocytes 21, positive to CD105, CD90 and CD73, and negative to CD45, CD34, CD14 and CD11b 22. Pre-clinical data showed therapeutic potentials of MSCs in ALI caused by endotoxin, pneumonia, or systemic sepsis, as summarized in Table 1 11, 23-37. The application of MSCs as a cell therapy for ALI was suggested to reduce lung inflammation, tissue oedema and injury, maintain the function of endothelial and epithelial barriers, accelerate the process of repair and to increase resistance to infection, as explained in Figure 2.

Table 1. Applying MSCs in pre-clinical ALI models caused by bacterial infection or toxins

ALI models	Resource and route of application of MSCs	Improved outcome	Ref.
IT LPS/rat	Intrapleural 1 × 10⁶ rat BM-MSCs with challenge	Lung injury, histology and inflammation	11
IT LPS/mice	IP 1 × 10⁶ human UC-MSCs 4 hr after challenge	Treg, survival time, body weight, histology and lung injury	23
OA LPS/mice	OA 2.5 × 10⁵ human BM-MSCs 4, 4.5 hr after challenge respectively	Inflammation and cytokines	24
CLP/mice	IV 2.5 × 10⁵ mouse BM-MSCs 6 hr after challenge	Mortality, injury, cytokine, and bacteria clearance	25
IT E. coli/mice	IT 1 × 10⁶ human BM-MSCs 4 hr after challenge	Bacterial clearance and inflammation	26
CLP/mice	IV 1 × 10⁶ mouse BM-MSCs 24 hrs before or 1 hr after challenge	Mortality and organ function	27
Endotoxin/ex vivo perfused human lung	Instil 5 × 10⁶ human MSCs 1 hr after challenge	Extravascular lung water, lung endothelial barrier permeability and alveolar fluid clearance	28
IP LPS/mice	IV 5 × 10⁵ mouse BM-MSCs 1 hr after challenge	Lung inflammation, injury and oedema	29
IT LPS/mice	IV 2.5 × 10⁵ mouse BM-MSCs with or without overexpressing angiopoietin 1 30 min. after challenge	Inflammation, cytokine and permeability	30
IP LPS/mice	IT 7.5 × 10⁵ mouse BM-MSC 4 hrs after challenge	Survival, and pulmonary oedema and permeability	31
IT endotoxin/mice	IV 2 × 10⁷ mouse bone marrow mononuclear cells 1 hr after challenge	Lung inflammation, alveolar collapse and interstitial oedema	32
IT E. coli/mice	IT 1 × 10⁵ human UC-MSCs 3 hr after challenge	Lung histology, inflammation and cytokine production	33
IP LPS/rat	IV 5 × 10⁵ human UC-MSCs 1 hr after challenge	Survival rate and inflammation	34
IT E. coli/mice	IT 7.5 × 10⁵ mouse BM-MSCs 4 hr after challenge	Survival and lung injury	35
IT LPS/mice	IV 3 × 10⁵ human orbital fat-derived MSCs 20 min. after challenge	Inflammation and permeability	36
IN LPS/mice	IT 2 × 10⁵mouse BM-MSCs 4 hr after challenge	Alveolar leucocytosis, protein leak, surfactant secretion and mortality	37

IV: intravenous; IP: intra-peritoneal; IT: intra-tracheal; CLP: caecal ligation and puncture; OA: oropharyngeal aspiration; IN: intranasal; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells; UC-MSCs: umbilical cord MSCs; BM-MSCs: bone marrow derived-MSCs; ALI: acute lung injury.

There were 283 clinical trials registered for MSCs application (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and 45 studies for MSCs by December 2012, of which two were related to lung injury. One was in the phase II of clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of human MSCs (PROCHYMAL™) for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and another in the phase I to test the safety and feasibility of MSCs for treatment of emphysema with the current status of recruiting participants. However, there are no clinical trials registered for MSCs in ALI or ARDS, a serious form of ALI 38.

Potential mechanisms of MSCs in ALI

Homing and migration of MSCs

Mesenchymal stem cells could be migrated and homed with the involvement of chemoattractive cytokines, proteolytic enzyme, surface adhesion molecules and/or mesenchymal matrix metalloproteinases 32. It was proposed that those signalling factors, including stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), platelet-derived growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, basic fibroblast growth factor, or others 39, could be initially released by injured tissues and serve as messages for expansion of endogenous pools of MSCs or as local chemo-attractants for migration of implanted MSCs 40, 41. On the other hand, MSCs could also express a number of chemokine receptors (CCR), for example, CCR1, CCR2, CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CCR8, CCR9, CCR10, CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, or CXCR5, in response to the chemokine-attractive gradients generated by the inflamed and/or injured site 39, 42, 43. The communications between chemoattractive cytokines and their receptors enable MSCs to home diverse tissues, among which the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis was emphasized. SDF-1, a small chemoattractive cytokine designated as chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (CXCL12), was up-regulated immediately after myocardial infarction and could sufficiently induce the migration of MSCs to injured sites 44. SDF-1 could induce the expansion of MSCs through the rearrangement of actin cytoskeleton, polarization and phosphorylation of the focal adhesion adapter protein paxillin, and focal adhesion turn over and ultimately migration 41. The functional expression of CXCR4 has been suggested to be required for the migration of MSCs to SDF-1 45, and then the activation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis could enhance the migration of MSCs following bleomycin-induced lung injury 46.

It is possible that the communication and interaction between adhesion molecules on MSCs and endothelial cells in compromised tissues may orient MSCs to the targeted tissue. Adhesion molecules have been suggested to play directional role in MSC homing. For example, MSCs could interact with pulmonary endothelial cells directly and maintain the integrity of endothelial barrier by preserving adherens junctions (VE-cadherin and β-catenin) and inhibiting leucocyte adhesion and adhesion molecule expression (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1), demonstrated by both in vitro and in vivo studies 38. Intravenously administered MSCs were found to have more affinity to the lung and liver in endotoxemia induced by LPS 47, and more MSCs appeared in the lung, kidney, and spleen in response to polymicrobial sepsis 27. These findings indicate that the lung is one of the most predominant organs/tissues for MSC homing, even though they could also home to and appeared at diverse sites of injury during the development of the multi-organ injury and dysfunction accompanied by the existence of ALI.

Anti-inflammatory effects

Acute inflammation is one of important defences against infections and foreign toxins, whereas uncontrollable inflammation caused by sepsis can compromise the lung and other organs 48. MSCs were found to protect the host from extraordinary inflammatory damage by enhancing host resistance to sepsis, and down-regulate expressions of pro-inflammatory factors, for example, IL-1β, IL-8, interferon (INF)-γ, TNF-α or others 49. MSCs could also regulate the development of lung inflammation through the production of anti-inflammatory agents such as IL-4 and IL-10 50, the reduction in neutrophil infiltration into the lung and attenuation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines in circulation, to maintain the balance of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses 51. The therapeutic effects of MSCs on E. coli-induced lung inflammation were demonstrated by the intratracheal transplantation of MSCs 3 hrs after the instillation of bacteria. Such ‘treatment’ could increase survival, attenuate lung injuries and reduce leucocyte infiltration and production of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2, 3 days after the induction of ALI in mice 33. A recent study demonstrated that human umbilical cord-derived MSCs could ameliorate LPS-induced ALI in a rat model, and found that those MSCs increased survival rate and reduced circulating levels of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, but not IL-10 34. MSCs could ameliorate the severity of lung inflammation, oedema, or injury. It may be a smart strategy to use MSCs as a temporary solution to down-regulate inflammatory responses and tissue injury in such acute phase.

Immunomodulatory effects

Mesenchymal stem cells could suppress or modulate innate and adaptive immune responses 52, probably through inhibiting the activation and proliferation of T lymphocytes and affecting functions of a broad range of immune cells, including nature killer (NK) cells, B cells and dendritic cells 53. MSCs could switch Th1 cell-based inflammatory response to Th2 cell-based anti-inflammatory response during the inflammation, probably through the dependent and/or independent interactions between inflammatory cells. Such interaction could lead to the release of soluble factors, including transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, prostaglandin (PGE) 2, IL-10 and IL-1RA. It was suggested that MSCs could be involved in the initiation of anti-inflammatory effects and immunosuppression through the expression and regulation of TLRs 54. The immunosuppressive phenotype of human bone marrow-derived-MSC was enhanced by activation of TLR3 and TLR4, dependently on the production of immunosuppressive kynurenines by the tryptophan-degrading enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 55. The ligation of TLR3 and TLR4 could inhibit the T cell modulatory ability of MSC by impairing Notch signalling, without influencing the differentiation potential 56. In addition, the ‘danger’ signals could be recognized through TLRs, which are activated and triggered to mobilize innate and adaptive host immune cells through the recruitment of MSCs 57. MSCs have more complicated effects on the immune system than the classical role as immune suppressor cells. It will be important to understand the mechanisms by which MSCs play apparently paradoxical roles in the immune response for developing MSC-based therapy in clinical application.

Attenuation of pulmonary oedema

The disruption of the lung microvascular endothelial cell barrier results in the increased lung vascular permeability and plasma extravasation, inflammatory cell infiltration, tissue oedema and injury, as well as impairment of gas-blood exchange 31, whereas therapy of MSCs could markedly attenuate pulmonary oedema in ALI 58, 59. One of the potential mechanisms by which MSCs could prevent or treat lung oedema in ALI is that a number of growth factors from MSCs may maintain or cure the endothelial cell barrier through the initiation of the healing and repair process through the binding to correspondent receptors on local cells. For example, MSCs can produce several growth factors, including keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), HGF, angiopoietin-1 and fibroblast growth factors. Of them, KGF could reduce pulmonary oedema in animals with ALI partly through increasing activities of epithelial sodium channels and Na-K ATPase and capacities for alveolar fluid transport 60-62. KGF induced alveolar type II cell proliferation through PI3K and p42/44 MAP kinase pathway 63. HGF could reduce pulmonary oedema through T-iam1-mediated Rac and Rho GTP binding proteins pathways 64, 65, whereas angiopoietin-1 might prevent the dysfunction of the endothelial barrier and inhibit the interaction between leucocytes and endothelial cells by modifying endothelial cell adhesion molecules and cell–cell junctions 66. In addition, implanted MSCs were proposed to directly integrate with damaged lung tissue, repair alveolar-capillary membrane, reduce alveolar-capillary membrane permeability, and improve diffuse pulmonary oedema 30, 32, 59.

Clearance of bacteria

Mesenchymal stem cells were found to improve the phagocytosis of resident immune cells to reduce bacterial burden and to increase survival of macrophages by up-regulating associated genes 54, 67. Peptides produced from MSCs could directly have the anti-bacterial activity, demonstrated by the finding that cathelicidin LL-37 produced by MSCs increased in experimental ALI caused by bacterial challenge and had antimicrobial effects by disrupting bacterial membranes 26, 68. Intratracheal treatment with wild-type MSCs improved the lung injury and survival in animals with bacterial pneumonia, and enhanced bacterial clearance from the alveolar space 4 hrs after administration, partly because of the upregulation of the antibacterial protein lipocalin 2 35. Intratracheal transplantation of umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs was found to attenuate E. coli-induced ALI primarily by down-modulating the inflammatory process and enhancing bacterial clearance 33. It implies that the enhanced clearance of bacteria by MSCs may contribute to the improvement of ALI induced by Gram-negative bacterial infection, or MSCs had directly inhibitory effects on the growth of Gram-positive bacteria 26.

Lung repair

Mesenchymal stem cells play an important role in the repair process, which may be initiated simultaneously with the development of ALI and may differentiate into lung epithelial cells and directly replace damaged cells in alveoli during the course of ALI. A single bone marrow-derived MSC could differentiate into cells of multiple different organs/tissues, of which 20% grew in the lung and even differentiated into alveolar epithelial cells 69. Bone marrow-derived stem cells engrafted into pulmonary epithelial layer and exhibited specific characteristics of lung epithelial cells 70. Pulmonary epithelial cells could be originated from circulating progenitors of both bone marrow and circulation identified by CK5⁺CXCR4⁺ markers 71. CXCR4/CXCL12-mediated recruitment of circulating progenitor epithelial cells was believed to be necessary for the reestablishment of a normal pseudostratified epithelium after airway injury. However, some studies on experimental lung injury demonstrated the engraftment rate of MSCs was less than 1–5% 31, 52, 69. MSCs enhanced restoration of systemic oxygenation and lung compliance, reduced total lung water, lung inflammation and histological lung injury, and restored lung structure in ventilation-induced ALI, probably through MSC-secreted products rather than MSCs per se. Such therapeutic effects on lung repair were suggested to be a KGF-dependent paracrine mechanism 72.

Microvesicles and mitochondria derived from MSCs

Increasing evidence has suggested a critical role of microvesicles in cell-based therapies in ALI and other disease models 37, 73-75. Studies from Bruno et al. demonstrated the microvesicles isolated from human adult MSCs could effectively protect against acute tubular injury 74 or ischaemia–reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury 75. Microvesicles conferred the resistance of tubular epithelial cells to apoptosis and stimulated proliferation, and the effect of microvesicles on the recovery of acute kidney injury was similar to the effect of human MSCs 74, 75.

Microvesicles, as small circular membrane fragments, are shed from the cell surface or released from the endosomal cell membrane compartment and play an important and underappreciated role in cell-cell communication 73. The intriguing microvesicle-mediated cell–cell communication system emerged very early during evolution and served as a template for the further development of intercellular interaction mechanisms involving soluble bioactive mediators and fine-tuned ligand-receptor interactions. The microvesicles may transfer specific genes or small organelles from MSCs to the injured targets to exert the protective effects. Most recently, these microvesicles have been shown to mediate the transfer of mitochondria, derived from bone marrow-derived stromal cells, into the alveolar epithelium in a LPS-induced ALI model 37. The stromal cells formed connexin 43-containing gap junctional channels with the alveolar epithelia, releasing mitochondria-containing microvesicles that the epithelia engulfed. These gap junctional channels and transferred mitochondria appeared to play a pivotal role in mediating the therapeutic effects of the stromal cells, as LPS-induced ALI was markedly abrogated by the instillation of wild-type stromal cells, but not of cells with gap junctional channel-mutant or with dysfunctional mitochondria 37. Microvesicles act as important mediators of intercellular communication and exert important biological effects on target cells, rather than cell debris or biologically irrelevant cell dust. Application of MSC-derived microvesicles to ALI appears to be a potential approach.

Effects from MSCs or secondary reactions

Mesenchymal stem cells per se were proposed to have therapeutic effects on ALI by the proliferation and differentiation in the lung, although the production of mediators from MSCs was considered to be even more dominant in the protective mechanisms. It was found that MSCs could down-regulate pro-inflammatory responses to endotoxin and up-regulate the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines in the lung after an intrapleural administration of MSCs 11. The injected MSCs were traced and found to be located in the intrapleural site rather than in lung tissue, indicating that the therapeutic effects of MSCs may result from the production of factors from MSCs via a paracrine/endocrine mechanism. Intravenous injection of orbital fat-derived stem/stromal cells could reduce LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation, endothelial and alveolar epithelial permeability, infiltration of neutrophil and macrophage, systemic proinflammatory chemokine levels such as macrophage inflammatory protein-1-γ, B-lymphocyte chemoattractant, IL-12 and subsequent circulation helper T cell numbers, whereas few human orbital fat-derived stem/stromal cells were detected in the recipient lung after acute inflammation subsided 36.

Considerations for translational medicine

Mesenchymal stem cells-based cell therapy is proposed as one of promising therapies for ALI. Abundant pre-clinical studies helped us to understand the pathogenesis of ALI and the mechanisms of MSCs for the therapeutic potential 11, 23-37. However, a number of issues should be considered and explored before MSCs become a viable therapy for ALI, including therapeutic efficacy, dosage, starting time, duration, frequency, standard, and monitoring.

A broad spectrum of tissues, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, muscle, dermis, placenta, or lung, have been identified as resources for MSCs, of which the lung stem and progenitor cells as an endogenous resource were found to be similar to MSCs in the bone marrow 40, 41. Among them, the bone marrow is commonly considered as the major origin of MSCs for experimental ALI, however, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) should not be neglected as one sort of the most popular adult stem cells which have been used to treat various diseases in both pre-clinical research and clinical trials 76. The potential effects of ADSCs on ALI will attract more attention and should be further evaluated in future studies. The roles of lung endothelial progenitor cells or vascular endothelial progenitor cells as resources of MSCs need to be further explored too. The predominant migration of MSCs to injured tissue can be used to design therapeutic strategies, for example, to apply MSCs as vectors for delivering pharmacological vehicles into the injured lung or to improve cell-based therapy via modulating MSCs migration.

The therapeutic effects of MSCs on ALI are still questioned 77, even though a number of studies on pre-treatment with MSCs have been performed in mice, rats, or rabbits. The reason for the existence of such questions and concerns is that there is still lack of evaluation criteria for the success of MSCs treatment, standardized manipulation of MSCs preparations, studies designed with a large scale of animals or performed in even large animals like pigs, or clinical phenotypes and outcome measured. It is also questionable how far MSCs can be applied to treat patients with ALI/ARDS, what critical steps are to be used to translate pre-clinical trials into clinical therapies, and whether MSCs are the hope or hype for clinical application 49. It is necessary to clarify whether MSCs per se or MSCs-associated factors play the most important role in the prevention and therapy for ALI/ARDS, which leads to different translational strategies of cell-based therapy to clinical application. Logical strategies and designs of pre-clinical studies to tackle those questions should be well considered and carried out. For example, MSCs-derived materials such as cell culture supernatants or microvesicles may be used to mimic the effects of MSCs in various disease models 26, 37, 73-75. Furthermore, defined target molecules from MSCs with obvious therapeutic efforts should be screened and selected through targeted proteomics and systems biology.

In conclusion, there is increasing evidence from pre-clinical studies to support preventive and therapeutic effects of MSCs in ALI/ARDS. Therapeutic effects of MSCs were noticed in various deliveries of cells (systemic, local, or other locations), multiple origins (bone marrow or other tissues), or different schedules of administrations (before or after the challenges). MSCs not only reduced the over-production of inflammatory mediators, leucocyte infiltration, tissue injury and pulmonary failure but also produced a number of beneficial factors and, through interaction with other cells, participated in the process of lung tissue repair. There are urgent needs of strategies, guidelines, standard operating procedures to MSC handling and evaluation criteria of patient recruitment and therapeutic efficacy to translate MSCs-based therapies into clinical application, a possible new and effective approach against ALI. Thus, we have to seriously consider if it is the time that MSCs are ready for clinical trials and applications or we are too optimistic to translate MSC therapy into clinical applications.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (30871130), Ministry of Education of China (NCET-12-0484), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR12H01003) and Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2010R10080, 2012C33017).

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1334–49.
10.1056/NEJM200005043421806
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2Eisner MD, Thompson T, Hudson LD, et al. Efficacy of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with different clinical risk factors for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164: 231–6.
10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2011093
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1685–93.
10.1056/NEJMoa050333
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1293–304.
10.1056/NEJMoa1011802
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29: 1303–10.
10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Burchardi H, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28: 108–21.
10.1007/s00134-001-1143-z
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7Crimi E, Slutsky AS. Inflammation and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004; 18: 477–92.
10.1016/j.bpa.2003.12.007
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
8Lee JW, Fang X, Krasnodembskaya A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for acute lung injury: role of paracrine soluble factors. Stem Cells. 2011; 29: 913–9.
10.1002/stem.643
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9Matthay MA, Thompson BT, Read EJ, et al. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells for severe acute lung injury. Chest. 2010; 138: 965–72.
10.1378/chest.10-0518
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10Kim J, Ma T. Autocrine fibroblast growth factor 2-mediated interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and the extracellular matrix under varying oxygen tension. J Cell Biochem. 2013; 114: 716–27.
10.1002/jcb.24413
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11Qin ZH, Xu JF, Qu JM, et al. Intrapleural delivery of MSCs attenuates acute lung injury by paracrine/endocrine mechanism. J Cell Mol Med. 2012; 16: 2745–53.
10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01597.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12Johnson ER, Matthay MA. Acute lung injury: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010; 23: 243–52.
10.1089/jamp.2009.0775
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13Ware LB, Matthay MA, Parsons PE, et al. Pathogenetic and prognostic significance of altered coagulation and fibrinolysis in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 1821–8.
10.1097/01.CCM.0000221922.08878.49
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14Wang XD, Adler KB, Erjefalt J, et al. Airway epithelial dysfunction in the development of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2007; 1: 149–55.
10.1586/17476348.1.1.149
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
15Li B, Dong CL, Wang GF, et al. Pulmonary epithelial CCR3 promotes LPS-induced lung inflammation by mediating release of IL-8. J Cell Physiol. 2011; 226: 2398–405.
10.1002/jcp.22577
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16Chen CS, Fang XC, Wang YL, et al. Preventive and therapeutic effects of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors on acute lung injury. Chest. 2011; 140: 391–400.
10.1378/chest.10-3060
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17Xu F, Droemann D, Rupp J, et al. Modulation of the inflammatory response to Streptococcus pneumoniae in a model of acute lung tissue infection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008; 39: 522–9.
10.1165/rcmb.2007-0328OC
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18Xu F, Xu Z, Zhang R, et al. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae induces COX-2 and PGE2 expression in lung epithelial cells via activation of p38 MAPK and NF-kappa B. Respir Res. 2008; 9: 16.
10.1186/1465-9921-9-16
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19Droemann D, Rupp J, Goldmann T, et al. Disparate innate immune responses to persistent and acute Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 175: 791–7.
10.1164/rccm.200607-926OC
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, et al. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968; 6: 230–47.
10.1097/00007890-196803000-00009
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21Koç ON, Lazarus HM. Mesenchymal stem cells: heading into the clinic. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001; 27: 235–9.
10.1038/sj.bmt.1702791
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006; 8: 315–7.
10.1080/14653240600855905
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23Sun J, Han ZB, Liao W, et al. Intrapulmonary delivery of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells attenuates acute lung injury by expanding CD4⁺CD25⁺ forkhead Boxp3 (FOXP3)⁺ regulatory T cells and balancing anti- and pro-inflammatory factors. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2011; 27: 587–96.
10.1159/000329980
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24Danchuk S, Ylostalo JH, Hossain F, et al. Human multipotent stromal cells attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice via secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced protein 6. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011; 2: 27.
10.1186/scrt68
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25Mei SH, Haitsma JJ, Dos Santos CC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation while enhancing bacterial clearance and improving survival in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182: 1047–57.
10.1164/rccm.201001-0010OC
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26Krasnodembskaya A, Song Y, Fang X, et al. Antibacterial effect of human mesenchymal stem cells is mediated in part from secretion of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Stem Cells. 2010; 28: 2229–38.
10.1002/stem.544
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
27Nemeth K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PS, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med. 2009; 15: 42–9.
10.1038/nm.1905
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
28Lee JW, Fang X, Gupta N, et al. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of E. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 16357–62.
10.1073/pnas.0907996106
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
29Xu J, Woods CR, Mora AL, et al. Prevention of endotoxin-induced systemic response by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007; 293: L131–41.
10.1152/ajplung.00431.2006
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
30Mei SH, McCarter SD, Deng Y, et al. Prevention of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing angiopoietin 1. PLoS Med. 2007; 4: e269.
10.1371/journal.pmed.0040269
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
31Gupta N, Su X, Popov B, et al. Intrapulmonary delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves survival and attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in mice. J Immunol. 2007; 179: 1855–63.
10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1855
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
32Prota LF, Lassance RM, Maron-Gutierrez T, et al. Bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy led to alveolar-capillary membrane repair, improving lung mechanics in endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. Cell Transplant. 2010; 19: 965–71.
10.3727/096368910X506845
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33Kim ES, Chang YS, Choi SJ, et al. Intratracheal transplantation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuates Escherichia coli-induced acute lung injury in mice. Respir Res. 2011; 12: 108.
10.1186/1465-9921-12-108
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
34Li J, Li D, Liu X, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reduce systemic inflammation and attenuate LPS-induced acute lung injury in rats. J Inflamm. 2012; 9: 33.
10.1186/1476-9255-9-33
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
35Gupta N, Krasnodembskaya A, Kapetanaki M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance survival and bacterial clearance in murine Escherichia coli pneumonia. Thorax. 2012; 67: 533–9.
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201176
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
36Chien MH, Bien MY, Ku CC, et al. Systemic human orbital fat-derived stem/stromal cell transplantation ameliorates acute inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40: 1245–53.
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc89a
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
37Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, et al. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat Med. 2012; 18: 759–65.
10.1038/nm.2736
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
38Pati S, Gerber MH, Menge TD, et al. Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit inflammation and preserve vascular endothelial integrity in the lungs after hemorrhagic shock. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e25171.
10.1371/journal.pone.0025171
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
39Von Lüttichau I, Notohamiprodjo M, Wechselberger A, et al. Human adult CD34⁻ progenitor cells functionally express the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR4, CCR7, CXCR5, and CCR10 but not CXCR4. Stem Cells Dev. 2005; 14: 329–36.
10.1089/scd.2005.14.329
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
40Weiss DJ, Kolls JK, Ortiz LA, et al. Stem cells and cell therapies in lung biology and lung diseases. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008; 5: 637–67.
10.1513/pats.200804-037DW
PubMed Google Scholar
41Maijenburg MW, van der Schoot CE, Voermans C. Mesenchymal stromal cell migration: possibilities to improve cellular therapy. Stem Cells Dev. 2012; 21: 19–29.
10.1089/scd.2011.0270
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
42Gonzalez-Rey E, Anderson P, Gonzalez MA, et al. Human adult stem cells derived from adipose tissue protect against experimental colitis and sepsis. Gut. 2009; 58: 929–39.
10.1136/gut.2008.168534
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
43Ringe J, Strassburg S, Neumann K, et al. Towards in situ tissue repair: human mesenchymal stem cells express chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2 and CCR2, and migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2. J Cell Biochem. 2007; 101: 135–46.
10.1002/jcb.21172
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
44Askari AT, Unzek S, Popovic ZB, et al. Effect of stromal-cell-derived factor 1 on stem-cell homing and tissue regeneration in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2003; 362: 697–703.
10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14232-8
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
45Wynn RF, Hart CA, Corradi-Perini C, et al. A small proportion of mesenchymal stem cells strongly expresses functionally active CXCR4 receptor capable of promoting migration to bone marrow. Blood. 2004; 104: 2643–5.
10.1182/blood-2004-02-0526
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
46Liebler JM, Lutzko C, Banfalvi A, et al. Retention of human bone marrow-derived cells in murine lungs following bleomycin-induced lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 295: L285–92.
10.1152/ajplung.00222.2007
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
47Weil BR, Herrmann JL, Abarbanell AM, et al. Intravenous Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells is associated with improved myocardial function during endotoxemia. Shock. 2011; 36: 235–41.
10.1097/SHK.0b013e318225f6ae
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
48Lagan AL, Melley DD, Evans TW, et al. Pathogenesis of the systemic inflammatory syndrome and acute lung injury: role of iron mobilization and decompartmentalization. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 294: L161–74.
10.1152/ajplung.00169.2007
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
49Hayes M, Curley G, Ansari B, et al. Clinical review: stem cell therapies for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome – hope or hype? Crit Care. 2012; 16: 205.
10.1186/cc10570
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
50Liang ZX, Sun JP, Wang P, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect rats from endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. Chin Med J. 2011; 124: 2715–22.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
51Iyer SS, Rojas M. Anti-inflammatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells: novel concept for future therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008; 8: 569–81.
10.1517/14712598.8.5.569
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
52Frank MH, Sayegh MH. Immunomodulatory functions of mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet. 2004; 363: 1411–2.
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16134-5
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
53Sotiropoulou PA, Perez SA, Gritzapis AD, et al. Interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and natural killer cells. Stem Cells. 2006; 24: 74–85.
10.1634/stemcells.2004-0359
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
54Wannemuehler TJ, Manukyan MC, Brewster BD, et al. Advances in mesenchymal stem cell research in sepsis. J Surg Res. 2012; 173: 113–26.
10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.053
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
55Opitz CA, Litzenburger UM, Lutz C, et al. Toll-like receptor engagement enhances the immunosuppressive properties of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by inducing indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 via interferon-beta and protein kinase R. Stem Cells. 2009; 27: 909–19.
10.1002/stem.7
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
56Liotta F, Angeli R, Cosmi L, et al. Toll-like receptors 3 and 4 are expressed by human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and can inhibit their T-cell modulatory activity by impairing Notch signaling. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 279–89.
10.1634/stemcells.2007-0454
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
57Waterman RS, Tomchuck SL, Henkle SL, et al. A new mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) paradigm: polarization into a pro-inflammatory MSC1 or an Immunosuppressive MSC2 phenotype. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5: e10088.
10.1371/journal.pone.0010088
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
58Matthay MA, Folkesson HG, Clerici C. Lung epithelial fluid transport and the resolution of pulmonary edema. Physiol Rev. 2002; 82: 569–600.
10.1152/physrev.00003.2002
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
59Folkesson HG, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial ion and fluid transport: recent progress. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006; 35: 10–9.
10.1165/rcmb.2006-0080SF
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
60Sartori C, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport in acute lung injury: new insights. Eur Respir J. 2002; 20: 1299–313.
10.1183/09031936.02.00401602
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
61Guery BP, Mason CM, Dobard EP, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor increases transalveolar sodium reabsorption in normal and injured rat lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 155: 1777–84.
10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154891
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
62Wang Y, Folkesson HG, Jayr C, et al. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport can be simultaneously upregulated by both KGF and beta-agonist therapy. J Appl Physiol. 1999; 87: 1852–60.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
63Portnoy J, Curran-Everett D, Mason RJ. Keratinocyte growth factor stimulates alveolar type II cell proliferation through the extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase pathways. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004; 30: 901–7.
10.1165/rcmb.2003-0406OC
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
64Birukova AA, Alekseeva E, Mikaelyan A, et al. HGF attenuates thrombin-induced endothelial permeability by Tiam1-mediated activation of the Rac pathway and by Tiam1/Rac-dependent inhibition of the Rho pathway. FASEB J. 2007; 21: 2776–86.
10.1096/fj.06-7660com
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
65Singleton PA, Salgia R, Moreno-Vinasco L, et al. CD44 regulates hepatocyte growth factor-mediated vascular integrity – Role of c-Met, Tiam1/Rac1, dynamin 2, and cortactin. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 30643–57.
10.1074/jbc.M702573200
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
66Fang X, Neyrinck AP, Matthay MA, et al. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells restore epithelial protein permeability in cultured human alveolar type II cells by secretion of angiopoietin-1. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 26211–22.
10.1074/jbc.M110.119917
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
67Lau AN, Goodwin M, Kim CF, et al. Stem cells and regenerative medicine in lung biology and diseases. Mol Ther. 2012; 20: 1116–30.
10.1038/mt.2012.37
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
68Nijnik A, Hancock RE. The roles of cathelicidin LL-37 in immune defences and novel clinical applications. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009; 16: 41–7.
10.1097/MOH.0b013e32831ac517
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
69Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, et al. Multi-organ, multilineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell. 2001; 105: 369–77.
10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00328-2
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
70Kotton DN, Ma BY, Cardoso WV, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells as progenitors of lung alveolar epithelium. Development. 2001; 128: 5181–8.
10.1242/dev.128.24.5181
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
71Gomperts BN, Belperio JA, Rao PN, et al. Circulating progenitor epithelial cells traffic via CXCR4/CXCL12 in response to airway injury. J Immunol. 2006; 176: 1916–27.
10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1916
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
72Curley GF, Hayes M, Ansari B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance recovery and repair following ventilator-induced lung injury in the rat. Thorax. 2012; 67: 496–501.
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201059
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
73Ratajczak MZ. The emerging role of microvesicles in cellular therapies for organ/tissue regeneration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 1453–6.
10.1093/ndt/gfr165
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
74Bruno S, Grange C, Deregibus MC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20: 1053–67.
10.1681/ASN.2008070798
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
75Gatti S, Bruno S, Deregibus MC, et al. Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischaemia-reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 1474–83.
10.1093/ndt/gfr015
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
76Tobita M, Orbay H, Mizuno H. Adipose-derived stem cells: current findings and future perspectives. Discov Med. 2011; 11: 160–70.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
77Lee JW, Zhu Y, Matthay MA. Cell-based therapy for acute lung injury: are we there yet? Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 1189–91.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182567fc5
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume17, Issue8

August 2013

Pages 927-935

Mesenchymal stem cells in acute lung injury: are they ready for translational medicine?

Abstract

Introduction

Complexity of ALI pathogenesis

Therapeutic potentials of MSCs in ALI

Potential mechanisms of MSCs in ALI

Homing and migration of MSCs

Anti-inflammatory effects

Immunomodulatory effects

Attenuation of pulmonary oedema

Clearance of bacteria

Lung repair

Microvesicles and mitochondria derived from MSCs

Effects from MSCs or secondary reactions

Considerations for translational medicine

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

Citing Literature

Figures

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Mesenchymal stem cells in acute lung injury: are they ready for translational medicine?

Abstract

Introduction

Complexity of ALI pathogenesis

Therapeutic potentials of MSCs in ALI

Potential mechanisms of MSCs in ALI

Homing and migration of MSCs

Anti-inflammatory effects

Immunomodulatory effects

Attenuation of pulmonary oedema

Clearance of bacteria

Lung repair

Microvesicles and mitochondria derived from MSCs

Effects from MSCs or secondary reactions

Considerations for translational medicine

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

Citing Literature

Figures

References

Related

Information