Volume 34, Issue 6 pp. 1370-1376
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Colchicine usage for prevention of post atrial fibrillation ablation pericarditis in patients undergoing high-power short-duration ablation

Arshad Muhammad Iqbal MD

Corresponding Author

Arshad Muhammad Iqbal MD

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Correspondence Arshad Muhammad Iqbal, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65201, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Kai Yu Li MD

Kai Yu Li MD

Department of Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sandeep Gautam MD, MPh, FHRS

Sandeep Gautam MD, MPh, FHRS

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 May 2023

Disclosures: None.

Abstract

Introduction

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with variable incidence (0.88%–10%) of pericarditis manifested as chest pain, possibly more prevalent with the advent of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation. This has led to the widespread use of colchicine in preventative protocols for postablation pericarditis. However, the efficacy of preventative colchicine has not been validated yet.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of a routine postoperative colchicine regimen (0.6 mg twice a day for 14 days post-AF ablation) for prevention of postablation pericarditis in patients undergoing HPSD ablation.

Method

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive single-operator HPSD AF ablation procedures at our institution from June 2019 to July 2022. A colchicine protocol was introduced in June 2021 for the prevention of postablation pericarditis. All ablations were performed with 50 watts. Patients were divided into colchicine and noncolchicine groups. We recorded incidence of postablation chest pain, emergency room (ER) visit for chest pain, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, any ER visit, hospitalization, AF recurrence, and cardioversion for AF within the first 30 days following ablation. We also recorded colchicine-related side effects and medication compliance.

Results

Two hundred and ninety-four consecutive HPSD AF ablation patients were screened for the study. After implementing the prespecified exclusion criteria, a total of 205 patients were included in the final analysis, yielding 101 patients in the colchicine group and 104 patients in the noncolchicine group. Both groups were well-matched for demographic and procedural parameters. There was no significant difference in postablation chest pain (9.9% vs. 8.6%, p = .7), pericardial effusion (2.9% vs. 0.9%, p = .1), ER visits (11.9% vs. 12.5%, p = .2), 30-day hospitalization for AF recurrence (0.9% vs. 0.96%, p = .3), and 30-day need for cardioversion for AF (3.9% vs. 5.7%, p = .2). Fifteen (15) patients had severe colchicine-related diarrhea, out of which 12 discontinued it prematurely. There were no major procedural complications in either group.

Conclusion

In this single-operator retrospective analysis, prophylactic colchicine was not associated with significant reduction in the incidence of postablation chest pain, pericarditis, 30 day hospitalization, ER visits, or AF recurrence or need of cardioversion within first 30 days after HPSD ablation for AF. However, its usage was associated with significant diarrhea. This study concludes no additional advantage of prophylactic use of colchicine after HPSD AF ablation.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.