Volume 29, Issue 3 pp. 497-503
TECHNIQUES, TECHNOLOGY, AND INNOVATIONS

Transvenous pacemaker implantation after the bidirectional Glenn operation for patients with complex congenital disease

Danielle E. Harake MD, MS

Danielle E. Harake MD, MS

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin M. Shannon MD

Kevin M. Shannon MD

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ahmanson/University of California Los Angeles Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jamil A. Aboulhosn MD

Jamil A. Aboulhosn MD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ahmanson/University of California Los Angeles Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeremy P. Moore MD, MS

Corresponding Author

Jeremy P. Moore MD, MS

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ahmanson/University of California Los Angeles Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Los Angeles, California, USA

Correspondence

Jeremy P. Moore, MD, MS, FHRS, Division of Cardiology, Ahmanson-UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, UCLA 100 Medical Plaza Dr. Suite 770, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 December 2017
Citations: 2

Section Editor: Samuel J. Asirvatham, MD

Funding information:

J. Moore receives grant funding from Biotronik for unrelated research. Other authors: No disclosures.

Abstract

Introduction

The bidirectional Glenn operation for congenital heart disease produces anatomical constraints to conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. An iliac approach, although not previously described in this population, is potentially a preferable alternative to a thoracotomy for epicardial pacing.

Methods and results

A single-center retrospective review was performed for all patients that underwent transvenous pacemaker implantation following the bidirectional Glenn operation with partial biventricular repair. Follow-up data, implant indications, and techniques were recorded. Five patients underwent a transvenous iliac approach (median age 26.9 years, interquartile range [IQR] 25.8–27.6). Pacing indications included AV block in 3 patients (2 requiring cardiac resychronization therapy) and sinus node dysfunction in 2. Implanted leads were atrial in 4 and ventricular in 3 (1 of the latter was placed in the coronary sinus). In two cases, transvenous leads were tunneled to a preexisting epicardial abdominal generator. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 1.0–16.7 years). One patient underwent device revision for lead position-related groin discomfort; a second patient developed atrial lead failure following a Maze operation and underwent lead replacement by the iliac approach. Patients were not routinely anticoagulated postprocedure given lead position in the subpulmonary circulation. At last follow-up, all patients were alive. One patient underwent heart transplantation 6 months after implant with only partial resolution of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.

Conclusions

Trans-iliac pacemaker placement may be an effective alternative to surgery for patients requiring permanent pacing after the Glenn operation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.