Volume 47, Issue 2 pp. 472-486
RESEARCH PAPER

A tale of four bears: Environmental signal on the phylogeographical patterns within the extant Ursus species

Carlos Luna-Aranguré

Carlos Luna-Aranguré

Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México

Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Unidad de Posgrado, Ciudad de México, México

Search for more papers by this author
Jorge Soberón

Jorge Soberón

Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ella Vázquez-Domínguez

Corresponding Author

Ella Vázquez-Domínguez

Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México

Correspondence

Ella Vázquez-Domínguez, Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, México.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 December 2019
Citations: 13
Handling Editor: Jenny McGuire

Abstract

Aim

Assessing the relevance of niche evolution in the diversification patterns and geographical distribution of species driven by climate remains a challenge. We apply an integrative approach to evaluate the role of the environment on the phylogeography of bear species, incorporating fossil data to characterize the changes in the ecological niche through time. We evaluate our approach with the four extant species of bears within Ursus, the best represented taxon in the fossil record of the family Ursidae.

Location

Eurasia and North America.

Taxa

Asian black bear, Ursus thibetanus; American black bear, U. americanus; Brown bear, U. arctos; and Polar bear, U. maritimus.

Methods

We built a genetic and a geographical database from all published mitochondrial DNA sequences and of species occurrence records. We defined the most significant climatic variables based on each species ecological realm using correlation matrices, and characterized the ecological niches and existing environmental conditions with ellipsoid models. We inferred their current and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) ecological niche modellings (ENMs) and compared the results with the fossil record. We estimated the times of divergence (d-loop sequences) of lineages and applied a phyloclimatespace approach to discern the phylogeographical patterns along each species’ ecological space.

Results

Ecological niche modelling showed wider niches for U. thibetanus and U. americanus encompassing higher temperature and precipitation, while U. arctos and U. maritimus showed an opposite pattern. LGM models were consistent with the fossil record, predicting 55%–89% of the fossil occurrences (within their suitability areas). The phyloclimatespace revealed different degrees of environmental signal in the lineages’ phylogeographical patterns and ecological trajectories associated with LGM climatic conditions. Results indicated habitat tracking and ecological expansion since the LGM towards more extreme precipitation and temperature conditions for three species, except U. maritimus that showed ecological niche reduction.

Main Conclusions

Incorporating fossil information from the LGM improved our characterization and interpretation of ecological models, by enabling definition of the limits of the climatic conditions explored by the species in the past. Our approach also provided insights about the existing set of environmental conditions shaping the ecological niche divergence of Ursus bears. We were able to depict key features of the lineages’ evolutionary history, ecology and distribution, revealing the dynamics of niche occupation and the environmental signal on the phylogeographical patterns of Ursus.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All the data used in the study comes from freely available databases (GBIF, Fossilworks, WorldClim, GenBank). The datasets we built are available from the Dryad Digital Repository at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dncjsxkvw

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.