Volume 73, Issue 8 pp. 1970-1981
Original Research: Empirical Research – Mixed Methods

A framework for transition to specialty practice programmes

Julia Morphet PhD RN

Corresponding Author

Julia Morphet PhD RN

Senior Lecturer

Nursing & Midwifery, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to J. Morphet:

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Virginia Plummer PhD RN

Virginia Plummer PhD RN

Associate Professor Nursing Research

Nursing Research, Monash University and Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Bridie Kent PhD RN

Bridie Kent PhD RN

Professor in Leadership in Nursing

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Julie Considine PhD RN

Julie Considine PhD RN

Professor

School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Centre for Patient Safety Research, Eastern Health Partnership, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 February 2017
Citations: 7

Abstract

Aim

To develop a framework for emergency nursing transition to specialty practice programmes.

Background

Transition to Specialty Practice programmes were introduced to fill workforce shortages and facilitate the transition of nurses to specialty nursing practice. These programmes are recognized as an essential preparation for emergency nurses. Emergency nursing Transition to Specialty Practice programmes have developed in an ad hoc manner and as a result, programme characteristics vary. Variability in programme characteristics may result in inconsistent preparation of emergency nurses.

Design

Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome model was used to integrate results of an Australian study of emergency nursing Transition to Specialty Practice programmes with key education, nursing practice and safety and quality standards to develop the Transition to Specialty Practice (Emergency Nursing) Framework.

Methods

An explanatory sequential design was used. Data were collected from 118 emergency departments over 10 months in 2013 using surveys. Thirteen interviews were also conducted. Comparisons were made using Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.

Results

Transition to Specialty Practice programmes were offered in 80 (72·1%) emergency departments surveyed, to improve safe delivery of patient care. Better professional development outcomes were achieved in emergency departments which employed participants in small groups (Median = 4 participants) and offered programmes of 6 months duration. Written assessments were significantly associated with articulation to postgraduate study (Chi-square Fisher's exact = <0·001).

Conclusion

The Transition to Specialty Practice (Emergency Nursing) Framework has been developed based on best available evidence to enable a standardized approach to the preparation of novice emergency nurses.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.