Volume 39, Issue 7 pp. 685-693

Treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with colestimide

Makiko Taniai

Makiko Taniai

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Etsuko Hashimoto

Etsuko Hashimoto

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Maki Tobari

Maki Tobari

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Satoru Yatsuji

Satoru Yatsuji

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Ikuko Haruta

Ikuko Haruta

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Katsutoshi Tokushige

Katsutoshi Tokushige

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Keiko Shiratori

Keiko Shiratori

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 June 2009
Citations: 21
Dr Etsuko Hashimoto, 8-1 Kawada-cho Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 162-8666, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim: To clarify the usefulness of colestimide in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with hyperlipidemia.

Methods: In an open-label randomized controlled trial, 17 NASH patients with hyperlipidemia received colestimide (3 g/day) for 24 weeks. There were 21 control patients. All patients received lifestyle modification therapy. Efficacy was assessed based on metabolic profile, insulin resistance, transaminases, serum hepatic fibrosis markers, adipokine levels, visceral fat on computed tomography (CT), and the fatty liver grade on CT. NASH patients with moderate to severe steatosis by histology were also evaluated separately.

Results: Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. Both groups experienced a significant decrease of BMI with no difference between them. However, visceral fat decreased significantly more in the colestimide group (P = 0.046). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) showed a significantly greater decrease in the colestimide group compared with the control group (P = 0.042). In patients with moderate to severe histological steatosis, there were significant differences between the two groups regard to HbA1c, transaminases, and hyaluronic acid (P = 0.018 for HbA1c, P = 0.003 for AST, P = 0.042 for alanine aminotransferase, and P = 0.042 for hyaluronic acid). Steatosis significantly improved in patients in the colestimide group who had fatty liver on CT (P = 0.049). In the colestimide group, abdominal distension and/or constipation were seen, but mostly tolerable, no other clinical or laboratory adverse events associated with the use of this medicine were not observed.

Conclusions: Colestimide seems to increase the efficacy of lifestyle modification in NASH patients with hyperlipidemia. Its beneficial effects were more prominent in NASH patients with moderate to severe histological steatosis.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.