Volume 97, Issue S263
Abstracts from the 2019 European Association for Vision and Eye Research Conference
Free Access

Effect of sustained-release bimatoprost implant (Bimatoprost SR) on visual field mean deviation in glaucoma patients in a phase 1/2 clinical trial

Ingeborg Stalmans

Ingeborg Stalmans

University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Marina Bejanian

Marina Bejanian

Allergan plc, Irvine, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Margot Goodkin

Margot Goodkin

Allergan employee, Irvine, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Jane Zhang

Jane Zhang

Allergan plc, Irvine, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Wang

Kevin Wang

Allergan plc, Irvine, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Marcos RivasMichael Robinson

Michael Robinson

Allergan employee, Irvine, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Douglas J. Rhee

Douglas J. Rhee

University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, United States

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 December 2019

Abstract

Purpose

Bimatoprost SR (BimSR), a biodegradable intracameral (IC) implant that slowly releases bimatoprost to lower intraocular pressure (IOP), is in Phase III development for glaucoma treatment. The effect of BimSR treatment on the VF (visual field) MD (mean difference) in glaucoma patients was evaluated in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Methods

Phase 1/2, prospective, 24-month, dose-ranging, paired-eye trial in 75 open-angle glaucoma patients with required baseline study eye VF loss (per protocol, MD <−1 and >−17 dB). BimSR (6, 10, 15, or 20 μg) was administered IC in the study eye; the fellow eye received topical bimatoprost 0.03% QD (bim). Rescue topical IOP-lowering medication or a single repeat treatment with implant was allowed. The primary efficacy measure was IOP. Humphrey perimetry 24-2 full threshold or SITA standard VF testing was done every 6 months. Results are presented for the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup treated with the dose strengths of BimSR that are continuing in development (10 and 15 μg).

Results

Mean IOP was reduced by all BimSR dose strengths. IOP was controlled without rescue or retreatment in 68%, 40%, and 28% of BimSR-treated eyes up to 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Month 24 mean (SD) change in MD from baseline was +0.20 (3.16) dB in all BimSR-treated eyes (n=59), −0.35 (3.04) dB in all topical bim-treated eyes (n=59), and +0.53 (3.07) dB in BimSR 10- and 15-μg–treated eyes (n=33). Among eyes with no rescue, mean (SD) month 24 change in MD from baseline was +0.71 (3.17) dB in all BimSR-treated eyes (n=25) and −0.15 (3.03) dB in all topical bim-treated eyes (n=55).

Conclusions

These results warrant further investigation to assess VF stability using sustained delivery medications compared to topical therapy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.