Volume 38, Issue 4 pp. 1027-1040

DUAL URBAN AND RURAL HYDROGRAPH SIGNALS IN THREE SMALL WATERSHEDS1

Scott A. Sheeder

Scott A. Sheeder

Respectively, Research Assistant, Environmental Resources Research Institute, 001 Land and Water Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; Graduate Student, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, 403 Walker Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and Professor, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, 619 Walker Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 (E-Mail/Sheeder: [email protected] ).

Search for more papers by this author
Jeremy D. Ross

Jeremy D. Ross

Respectively, Research Assistant, Environmental Resources Research Institute, 001 Land and Water Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; Graduate Student, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, 403 Walker Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and Professor, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, 619 Walker Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 (E-Mail/Sheeder: [email protected] ).

Search for more papers by this author
Toby N. Carlson

Toby N. Carlson

Respectively, Research Assistant, Environmental Resources Research Institute, 001 Land and Water Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; Graduate Student, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, 403 Walker Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and Professor, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, 619 Walker Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 (E-Mail/Sheeder: [email protected] ).

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 June 2007
Citations: 38
1

Paper No. 00117 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association.Discussions are open until February 1, 2003.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Many studies can be found in the literature pertaining to the effects of urbanization on surface runoff in small watersheds and the hydrologic response of undeveloped watersheds. However, an extensive literature review yielded few published studies that illustrate differing hydrologic responses from multiple source areas within a watershed. The concepts discussed here are not new, but the methods used provide a unique, basic procedure for investigating stormwater hydrology in topographically diverse basins. Six storm hydrographs from three small central Pennsylvania watersheds were analyzed for this paper; five are presented. Two important conclusions are deduced from this investigation. First, in all cases we found two distinct peaks in stream discharge, each representing different contributing areas to direct discharge with greatly differing curve numbers and lags representative of urban and rural source regions. Second, the direct discharge represents only a small fraction of the total drainage area with the urban peak becoming increasingly important with respect to the rural peak with the amount of urbanization and as the magnitude of the rain event decreases.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.