REPLY TO DISCUSSION by Gregory S. Bevenger and Rudy M. King1
“Application of the Pebble Count: Notes on Purpose, Method, and Variants”2
First published: 08 June 2007
No abstract is available for this article.
LITERATURE CITED
-
Adams, J. N. and
R. L. Beschta, 1980. Gravel Bed Composition in Oregon Coastal Streams.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
37: 1514–1521.
-
Bevenger, G. S. and
R. M. King, 1995. A Pebble Count Procedure for Assessing Watershed Cumulative Effects. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-RP-319, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
-
Bevenger, G. S. and
R. M. King, 1997. Discussion: Application of the Pebble Count: Notes on Purpose, Method, and Variants, by G. M. Kondolf.
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
33(6): 0000–0000.
-
Brush, L. M., 1961. Drainage Basins, Channels, and Flow Characteristics of Selected Streams in Central Pennsylvania. U.S. Geo. logical Survey Professional Paper 282-F.
-
Church, M. A.,
D. G. McLean, and
J. F. Wolcott, 1987. River Bed Gravels: Sampling and Analysis. In: Sediment Transport in Gravel Bed Rivers, C. R. Thorne,
J. C. Bathurst, and
R. D. Hey (Editors). John Wiley & Sons,
Chichester
,
UK
, pp.
43–79.
-
Kondolf, G. M., 1997. Application of the Pebble Count Procedure: A Note on Purpose and Method.
Journal of the American Resources Association
33(1): 79–87.
-
Mosley, M. P. and
D. S. Tinsdale, 1985. Sediment Variability and Bed Material Sampling in Gravel Bed Rivers.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
10: 465–482.
-
Wolman, M. G., 1954. A Method of Sampling Coarse River-Bed Material.
Transactions of the American Geophysical Union
35(6): 951–956.
-
Wolman, M. G. and
A. P. Schick, 1967. Effects of Construction on Fluvial Sediment: Urban and Suburban Areas of Maryland.
Water Resources Research
3: 451–462.
