Volume 18, Issue 4 pp. 863-878
Full Access

A BIOPSY SYSTEM FOR SMALL CETACEANS: DARTING SUCCESS AND WOUND HEALING IN TURSIOPS SPP.

Michael Krützen

Corresponding Author

Michael Krützen

School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia E-mail: [email protected]

Person to whom correspondence should be sent.Search for more papers by this author
Lynne M. Barré

Lynne M. Barré

National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Luciana M. Möller

Luciana M. Möller

Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales 2109, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Michael R. Heithaus

Michael R. Heithaus

Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Colleen Simms

Colleen Simms

Department of Conservation and Land Management, Knight Terrace, Denham Western Australia 6537, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
William B. Sherwin

William B. Sherwin

School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 August 2006
Citations: 218

Abstract

Together with PAXARMS (NZ), we developed a biopsy system for small cetaceans and tested it on four populations of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.). The system consists of a modified 0.22 caliber rifle, and biopsy darts made out of polycarbonate with stainless steel biopsy tips. Animals were darted at a range of 2–15 m while travelling parallel to the vessel. Overall sampling success for obtaining biopsy samples when an animal was struck ranged from 96.6% to 100% in the four populations. However, hit rate varied for the four different populations. We did not observe a significant difference in strength of the reaction to the darting procedure when an animal was hit or missed, both among and within populations. Data from one population showed no significant difference in the reaction to biopsy sampling by four different age-sex classes. The only factor that had a significant influence on darting success was the hit location. Furthermore, we observed a significant positive correlation between the size of the sample obtained and the reaction to biopsy sampling. Biopsy samples were sufficient for microsatellite and d-loop analysis in 95.8% and for genetic sexing in 99% of all cases. In animals that we observed on a daily basis, wounds were healed after approximately 23 d.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.