Volume 6, Issue 5 pp. 404-411

Reading difficulty after stroke: ocular and non ocular causes

Fiona Rowe

Corresponding Author

Fiona Rowe

Orthoptics and vision science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Fiona Rowe*, Directorate of orthoptics and vision science, Thompson Yates Building, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 3GB, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
David Wright

David Wright

Altnagelvin Hospitals HHS Trust, Altnagelvin, Northern Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
Darren Brand

Darren Brand

NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayr, Scotland, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Carole Jackson

Carole Jackson

Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Alison Price

Alison Price

Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Linda Walker

Linda Walker

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Shirley Harrison

Shirley Harrison

Bury PCT, Bury, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Carla Eccleston

Carla Eccleston

Derby Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tallat Maan

Tallat Maan

Durham and Darlington Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Claire Scott

Claire Scott

Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Linda Vogwell

Linda Vogwell

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Peel

Sarah Peel

St Helier General Hospital, Jersey, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Leonie Robson

Leonie Robson

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Nicola Akerman

Nicola Akerman

University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline Dodridge

Caroline Dodridge

Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Claire Howard

Claire Howard

Salford Primary Care Trust, Salford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tracey Shipman

Tracey Shipman

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Una Sperring

Una Sperring

Swindon and Marlborough NHS Trust, Swindon, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sue Yarde

Sue Yarde

Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust, Taunton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Fiona Rowe

Fiona Rowe

Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sonia MacDiarmid

Sonia MacDiarmid

Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Trust, Wigan, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Cicely Freeman

Cicely Freeman

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2011
Citations: 4

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Abstract

Background Ocular causes of reading impairment following stroke include visual field loss, eye movement impairment and poor central vision. Non ocular causes may include cognitive errors or language impairment.

Aim The purpose of this study was to identify all patients referred with suspected visual impairment who had reported reading difficulty to establish the prevalence of ocular and non ocular causes.

Methods Prospective, multicentre, observation study with standardised referral and assessment forms across 21 sites. Visual assessment included visual acuity measurement, visual field assessment, ocular alignment, and movement and visual inattention assessment. Multicentre ethical approval and informed patient consent were obtained.

Results A total of 915 patients were recruited, with a mean age of 69·18 years (standard deviation 14·19). Reading difficulties were reported by 177 patients (19·3%), with reading difficulty as the only symptom in 39 patients. Fifteen patients had normal visual assessment but with a diagnosis of expressive or receptive aphasia. Eight patients had alexia. One hundred and nine patients had visual field loss, 85 with eye movement abnormality, 27 with low vision and 39 patients with visual perceptual impairment. Eighty-seven patients had multiple ocular diagnoses with combined visual field, eye movement, low vision or inattention problems. All patients with visual impairment were given targeted treatment and/or advice including prisms, occlusion, refraction, low vision aids and scanning exercises.

Conclusions Patients complaining of reading difficulty were mostly found to have visual impairment relating to low vision, eye movement or visual field loss. A small number were found to have non ocular causes of reading difficulty. Treatment or advice was possible for all patients with visual impairment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.