Reading difficulty after stroke: ocular and non ocular causes
Corresponding Author
Fiona Rowe
Orthoptics and vision science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Fiona Rowe*, Directorate of orthoptics and vision science, Thompson Yates Building, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 3GB, UK.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDavid Wright
Altnagelvin Hospitals HHS Trust, Altnagelvin, Northern Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorAlison Price
Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTallat Maan
Durham and Darlington Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorLinda Vogwell
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorLeonie Robson
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCaroline Dodridge
Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTracey Shipman
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorFiona Rowe
Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK
Search for more papers by this authorSonia MacDiarmid
Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Trust, Wigan, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCicely Freeman
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Fiona Rowe
Orthoptics and vision science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Fiona Rowe*, Directorate of orthoptics and vision science, Thompson Yates Building, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 3GB, UK.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDavid Wright
Altnagelvin Hospitals HHS Trust, Altnagelvin, Northern Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorAlison Price
Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTallat Maan
Durham and Darlington Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorLinda Vogwell
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorLeonie Robson
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCaroline Dodridge
Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTracey Shipman
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorFiona Rowe
Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK
Search for more papers by this authorSonia MacDiarmid
Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Trust, Wigan, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCicely Freeman
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorConflict of interest: None declared.
Abstract
Background Ocular causes of reading impairment following stroke include visual field loss, eye movement impairment and poor central vision. Non ocular causes may include cognitive errors or language impairment.
Aim The purpose of this study was to identify all patients referred with suspected visual impairment who had reported reading difficulty to establish the prevalence of ocular and non ocular causes.
Methods Prospective, multicentre, observation study with standardised referral and assessment forms across 21 sites. Visual assessment included visual acuity measurement, visual field assessment, ocular alignment, and movement and visual inattention assessment. Multicentre ethical approval and informed patient consent were obtained.
Results A total of 915 patients were recruited, with a mean age of 69·18 years (standard deviation 14·19). Reading difficulties were reported by 177 patients (19·3%), with reading difficulty as the only symptom in 39 patients. Fifteen patients had normal visual assessment but with a diagnosis of expressive or receptive aphasia. Eight patients had alexia. One hundred and nine patients had visual field loss, 85 with eye movement abnormality, 27 with low vision and 39 patients with visual perceptual impairment. Eighty-seven patients had multiple ocular diagnoses with combined visual field, eye movement, low vision or inattention problems. All patients with visual impairment were given targeted treatment and/or advice including prisms, occlusion, refraction, low vision aids and scanning exercises.
Conclusions Patients complaining of reading difficulty were mostly found to have visual impairment relating to low vision, eye movement or visual field loss. A small number were found to have non ocular causes of reading difficulty. Treatment or advice was possible for all patients with visual impairment.
References
- 1 Rowe F, Brand D, Jackson CA et al. Visual impairment following stroke: do stroke patients require vision assessment? Age Aging 2009; 38: 188–93.
- 2 Jones SA, Shinton RA. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing 2006; 35: 560–5.
- 3 Lotery AJ, Wiggam MI, Jackson AJ et al. Correctable visual impairment in stroke rehabilitation patients. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 221–2.
- 4 MacIntosh C. Stroke re-visited: visual problems following stroke and their effect on rehabilitation. Br Orthopt J 2003; 60: 10–4.
- 5 Clisby C. Visual assessment of patients with cerebrovascular accident on the elderly care wards. Br Orthopt J 1995; 52: 38–40.
- 6 Freeman CF, Rudge NB. Cerebrovascular accident and the Orthoptist. Br Orthopt J 1988; 45: 8–18.
- 7 Rowe FJ VIS group UK. The profile of strabismus in stroke survivors. : Eye 2010; 24: 682–5.
- 8 Rowe F VIS group UK. Visual perceptual consequences of stroke. Strabismus 2009; 17: 24–8.
- 9 Wolter M, Preda S. Visual deficits following stroke: maximising participation in rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006; 13: 12–21.
- 10 Gall C, Lucklum J, Sabel BA, Franke GH. Vision- and health-related quality of life in patients with visual field loss after postchiasmatic lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 2765–76.
- 11 Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 1986; 17: 765–76.
- 12 Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke 1986; 17: 363–9.
- 13 Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Panda-Jonas S et al. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam study. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1788–94.
- 14 Machner B, Sprenger A, Sander T et al. Visual search disorders in acute and chronic homonymous hemianopia: lesion effects and adaptive strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1164: 419–26.
- 15 Schuett S, Heywood CA, Kentridge RW, Zihl J. The significance of visual information processing in reading: insights from hemianopic dyslexia. Neuropsychologica 2008; 46: 2445–62.
- 16 Sheldon CA, Malcolm GL, Barton JJ. Alexia with and without agraphia: an assessment of two classical syndromes. Can J Neurol Sci 2008; 35: 616–24.
- 17 Leff AP, Scott SK, Crewes H et al. Impaired reading in patients with right hemianopia. Ann Neurol 2000; 47: 171–8.
- 18 Warnecke P. A caregiver's eye on elders with low vision. Caring 2003; 22: 12–5.
- 19 Department of Transport. Drivers Medical Group, Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea. At a glance: Guide to the current medical standards of fitness to drive, 2007. Available at http://www.dft.gov.uk/dvla/medical/ataglance.aspx (accessed 1 February 2011)
- 20 World Health Organisation 2010. Available at http://www.who.int/blindness/causes/priority/en/index5.html (accessed 1 February 2011)
- 21 Cherney LR. Aphasia, alexia, and oral reading. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004; 11: 22–36.
- 22 Sakurai Y, Takeuchi S, Takada T, Horiuchi E, Nakase H, Sakuta M. Alexia caused by a fusiform or posterior inferior temporal lesion. J Neurol Sci 2000; 178: 42–51.
- 23 Zihl J. Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia. Brain 1995; 118: 891–912.
- 24 Pambakian AL, Wooding DS, Patel N, Morland AB, Kennard C, Mannan SK. Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 751–9.
- 25 McDonald SA, Spitsyna G, Shillcock RC, Wise RJ, Leff AP. Patients with hemianopic alexia adopt an inefficient eye movement strategy when reading text. Brain 2006; 129: 158–67.
- 26 Pflugshaupt T, Gutbrod K, Wurtz P et al. About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia. Brain 2009; 132: 1907–17.
- 27 Lamoureux EL, Fenwick E, Moore K, Klaic M, Borschmann K, Hill K. Impact of the severity of distance and near-vision impairment on depression and vision-specific quality of life in older people living in residential care. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 4103–9.
- 28 Ciuffreda KJ, Kapoor N, Rutner D, Suchoff IB, Han ME, Craig S. Occurrence of oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis. Optometry 2007; 78: 155–61.
- 29 Pierrot-Deseilligny C. Saccade and smooth-pursuit impairment after cerebral hemispheric lesions. Eur Neurol 1994; 34: 121–34.
- 30 Cohen Y, Segal O, Barkana Y et al. Correlation between asthenopic symptoms and different measurements of convergence and reading comprehension and saccadic fixation eye movements. Optometry 2010; 81: 28–34.
- 31 Scheiman M, Rouse M, Kulp MT, Cotter S, Hertle R, Mitchell GL. Treatment of convergence insufficiency in childhood: a current perspective. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 420–8.
- 32 Wick B. Vision training for presbyopic nonstrabismic patients. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977; 54: 244–7.
- 33 Stone SP, Halligan PW, Greenwood RJ. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age Aging 1993; 22: 46–52.
- 34 Sunderland A, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. The natural history of visual neglect after stroke. Indications from two methods of assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1987; 9: 55–9.
- 35 Leff AP, Behmann M. Treatment of reading impairment after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2008; 21: 644–8.
- 36 Hämäläinen HA, Julkunen LAM. Treatment of visual field defects after stroke. Adv Clin Neurosci Rehabil 2004; 3: 17–8.
- 37 Horton JC. Disappointing results from Nova Vision's visual restoration therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1–2.
- 38 Horton JC. Vision restoration therapy: confounded by eye movements. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 792–4.
- 39 Reinhard J, Schreiber A, Schiefer U et al. Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 30–5.
- 40 Sabel BA. Vision restoration therapy and raising red flags too early. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 659–60.
- 41 Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Rehabilitation for visual disorders. J Neurophthalmol 2010; 30: 73–84.
- 42 Gall C, Mueller I, Gudlin J et al. Vision- and health-related quality of life before and after vision restoration training in cerebrally damaged patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2008; 26: 341–53.
- 43 Sahraie A. Induced visual sensitivity changes in chronic hemianopia. Curr Opin Neurol 2007; 20: 661–6.
- 44 Virgili G, Acosta R. Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 18: 003303.
- 45 Nguyen NX, Weismann M, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Improvement of reading speed after providing of low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87: 849–53.
- 46 Ciuffreda KJ, Han Y, Kapoor N, Ficarra AP. Oculomotor rehabilitation for reading in acquired brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2006; 21: 9–21.
- 47 Kapoor N, Ciuffreda KJ, Han Y. Oculomotor rehabilitation in acquired brain injury: a case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1667–78.
- 48 Scheiman M, Cooper J, Mitchell GL et al. A survey of treatment modalities for convergence insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 151–7.
- 49 Kerkhoff G, Münssinger U, Meier EK. Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 474–81.
- 50 Rowe FJ VIS group. The spectrum of nystagmus following cerebro-vascular accident. British Irish Orth J 2008; 5: 22–5.
- 51 Rowe FJ, Noonan CP. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of strabismus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 2009; 15: 006499.
- 52 MacEwen C, Gregson R. Manual of Strabismus Surgery. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2003.
- 53 Choudhuri I, Sarvananthan N, Gottlob I. Survey of management of acquired nystagmus in the United Kingdom. Eye 2007; 21: 1194–7.