Transformations
Laura Kalman,
Laura Kalman
Laura Kalman is professor of history, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Search for more papers by this authorLaura Kalman,
Laura Kalman
Laura Kalman is professor of history, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Search for more papers by this authorI thank Daniel Emst, W. Randall Garr, Sarah Gordon, Chad Kutmas, Pnina Lahav, and John Henry Schlegel for their help with this essay. An earlier version appeared in Tulsa Law Review (Kalman 2002).

REFERENCES
- Arnold, Morris. 1977. Book Review. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 125: 241–50.
- Blackmar, Charles. 1978. Book Review. Saint Louis University Law Journal 22: 228–32.
- Bloomfield, Max. 1977. Book Review. Vanderbilt Law Review 30: 1102–07.
- Ernst, Daniel. 1993. The Critical Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. Yale Law Journal 101: 1019–76.
- Foner, Eric. 1977. Get A Lawyer! New York Review of Books. 14 April, 37.
- Genovese, Eugene. 1978. Book Review. Harvard Law Review 91: 726–36.
- Gordon, Robert. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36: 57–125.
- Gordon, Robert. 2002. Morton Horwitz and His Critics: A Conflict of Narratives. Tulsa Law Review 37: 915–27.
- Gutman, Herbert. 1983. No title. In Visions of History, ed. Henry Abelove, and E. P. Thompson, 187–216. New York : Pantheon.
- Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F. D. R. New York : Vintage Books.
- Holt, Wythe. 1982. Morton Horwitz and the Transformation of American Legal History. William and Mary Law Review 23: 663–723.
- Horwitz, Morton. 1971. The Emergence of an Instrumental Conception of American Law, 1780-1820. Perspectives in American History 5: 287–326.
-
Horwitz, Morton. 1973. The Conservative Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History.
American Journal of Legal History
17: 275–94.
10.2307/845147 Google Scholar
-
Horwitz, Morton. 1975. The Rise of Legal Formalism.
American Journal of Legal History
19: 251–64.
10.2307/845052 Google Scholar
-
Horwitz, Morton. 1977. Book Review.
Yale Law Journal
86: 561–66.
10.2307/795801 Google Scholar
-
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy.
New York
: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780195070248.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Horwitz, Morton. 1999. The Warren Court and the Pursuit of Justice. New York : Hill and Wang.
-
Hurst, J. Willard. 1977. Book Review.
American Journal of Legal History
21: 175–79.
10.2307/845213 Google Scholar
- Kalman, Laura. 2002. Transformations. Tulsa Law Review 37: 849–56.
- Karsten, Peter. 1997. Heart Versus Head: Judge-Made Law in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.
- Kettner, James. 1977. Book Review. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8: 390–92.
- McClain, Charles. 1980. Legal Change and Class Interests: A Review Essay on Morton Horwitz's Transformation of American Law. California Law Review 68: 382–97.
- Moglen, Eben. 1993. The Transformation of Morton Horwitz. Columbia Law Review 93: 1042–59.
- Newmyer, Kent. 1977. Book Review. American Historical Review 82: 1067–68.
- Presser, Stephen. 1977 Revising the Conservative Tradition: Towards A New American Legal History. New York University Law Review 52: 700–25.
- Preyer Kathryn. 1978. Book Review. Journal of American History 64: 1099–1121.
- Reid, John. 1977. A Plot Too Doctrinaire. Texas Law Review 55: 1307–21.
-
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.
Cambridge
,
England
: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511804397 Google Scholar
- Scheiber, Harry. 1977. Back to “The Legal Mind”? Doctrinal Analysis and the History of the Law. Reviews in American History 5: 458–66.
- Schwartz, Gary. 1981. Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth-Century America: A Reinterpretation. Yale Law Journal 90: 1717–75.
- Simpson, A. W. B. 1980. The Horwitz Thesis and the History of Contracts. University of Chicago Law Review 46: 533–601.
- Teachout, Peter. 1978. Light in Ashes: The Problem of “Respect for the Rule of Law” in American Legal History. New York University Law Review 53: 241–88.
- Tushnet, Mark. 1978. A Marxist Interpretation of American Law. Marxist Perspectives 1: 96–116.
- Tushnet, Mark. 1983. Critical Legal Studies: An Introduction to Its Origin and Underpinnings. Journal of Legal Education 36: 505–17.
- White, G. Edward. 1993. Transforming History in the Postmodern Era. Michigan Law Review 91: 1315–52.