Volume 1, Issue 1-2 pp. 27-34

Controversies in Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Disease

Lorna Swan MD

Corresponding Author

Lorna Swan MD

Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK;

The Adult Congenital Heart Programme, Royal Brompton Hospital/National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

Lorna Swan, MD, Adult Congenital Heart Programme, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. Tel: (+44) 20-7351-8227; Fax: (+44) 20-7351-8629; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Martin Lupton MD

Martin Lupton MD

High-Risk Obstetrics Unit, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital and Imperial College, London, UK;

Search for more papers by this author
John Anthony MD

John Anthony MD

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Cape Town, South Africa;

Search for more papers by this author
Steve M. Yentis MBBS

Steve M. Yentis MBBS

High-Risk Obstetrics Unit, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital and Imperial College, London, UK;

Magill Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care & Pain Management, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK;

Search for more papers by this author
Philip J. Steer MD

Philip J. Steer MD

High-Risk Obstetrics Unit, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital and Imperial College, London, UK;

Search for more papers by this author
Michael A. Gatzoulis MD

Michael A. Gatzoulis MD

High-Risk Obstetrics Unit, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital and Imperial College, London, UK;

The Adult Congenital Heart Programme, Royal Brompton Hospital/National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 March 2006
Citations: 22

ABSTRACT

As increasing numbers of children with congenital heart disorders reach adulthood, the family physician, cardiologist, and obstetrician will increasingly be called upon to give advice regarding the safety of pregnancy. This need has been further highlighted by the recognition that maternal mortality associated with cardiac disease is rising. Unfortunately, this field of practice remains relatively “evidence-sparse” with many management decisions being guided by anecdote and “best guess” common sense. Not surprisingly, this results in many fundamental controversies over the optimal care these patients should receive. This article highlights, through the use of case histories, some of these contentious areas, reflecting the different manifestations of congenital maternal cardiac disease and highlighting the limitations of our knowledge.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.