Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volume 15, Issue 2 pp. 243-250

ARTICLE

Localized Management of Sinus Floor Technique for Implant Placement in Fresh Molar Sockets

Giovanni B. Bruschi MD, DDS,

Giovanni B. Bruschi MD, DDS

Private practice, Rome, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Roberto Crespi MD, MS,

Corresponding Author

Roberto Crespi MD, MS

clinical professor, Department of Dentistry, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy;

Dr. Roberto Crespi, Department of Dentistry, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, Milano 20132, Italy; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author

Paolo Capparè MD,

Paolo Capparè MD

clinician, Department of Dentistry, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Fabrizio Bravi DDS,

Fabrizio Bravi DDS

Private practice, Rome, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Ernesto Bruschi DDS,

Ernesto Bruschi DDS

Private practice, Rome, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Enrico Gherlone MD, DMD, PhD,

Enrico Gherlone MD, DMD, PhD

full professor and chairman, Department of Dentistry, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Giovanni B. Bruschi MD, DDS,

Giovanni B. Bruschi MD, DDS

Private practice, Rome, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Roberto Crespi MD, MS,

Corresponding Author

Roberto Crespi MD, MS

clinical professor, Department of Dentistry, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy;

Dr. Roberto Crespi, Department of Dentistry, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, Milano 20132, Italy; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author

Paolo Capparè MD,

Paolo Capparè MD

clinician, Department of Dentistry, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Fabrizio Bravi DDS,

Fabrizio Bravi DDS

Private practice, Rome, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Ernesto Bruschi DDS,

Ernesto Bruschi DDS

Private practice, Rome, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author

Enrico Gherlone MD, DMD, PhD,

Enrico Gherlone MD, DMD, PhD

full professor and chairman, Department of Dentistry, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 20 May 2011

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00348.x

Citations: 42

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of osteotome for vertical bone augmentation and localized sinus elevation with minimal surgical trauma represents a suitable procedure to increase the vertical dimension of available bone for implant placement.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report clinical and radiographic results of localized management of sinus floor (LMSF) in fresh molar sockets at 13-year follow-up.

Materials and Methods: Fifty-three patients, needing one or two maxillary molar extraction, were enrolled in this study. LMFS procedure was performed and 68 implants were positioned. A presurgical distance from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus and the amount of new radiopacity between the sinus floor and alveolar crest were measured from the mesial and distal surfaces of each dental implant surface.

Results: After a mean follow-up period of 9.76 ± 5.27 years (ranged from 4 to 17 years) a survival rate of 100% was reported. Mean bone height at temporary prosthesis placement was 7.99 ± 1.16 mm. They were stable over time, reporting a mean value of 8.01 ± 1.46 mm at 13-year follow-up.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated that LMSF procedure in fresh molar sockets allowed to expand the dimensions of resorbed posterior maxillary alveolar bone both vertically and horizontally with a success rate of 100% of implant osseointegration over time.

REFERENCES

1 Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 48–56.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2 Wehrbein H, Diedrich P. Progressive pneumatization of the basal maxillary sinus after extraction and space closure. [German]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1992; 53: 77–83.
10.1007/BF02164641
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
3 Schwartz-Arad D, Grossman Y, Chaushu G. The clinical effectiveness of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sites of molar teeth. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 839–844.
10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.839
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4 Fugazzotto PA, De Paoli S. Sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction: success and failure rates of 137 implants in function for up to 3 years. J Periodontol 2002; 73: 39–44.
10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.39
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 Barone A, Cornelini R, Ciaglia R, Covani U. Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets and simultaneous osteotome sinus floor elevation: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 283–289.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6 Summers RB. The osteotome technique: less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994; 15: 698–708.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
7 Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 853–858.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8 Bruschi GB, Scipioni A, Calesini G, Bruschi E. Localized management of sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 219–226.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 Kim S-W, Lee K, Yun K-I, Kim C-H, Park J-U. Adult stem cells derived from human maxillary sinus membrane and their osteogenic differentiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 991–998.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eiksson RA. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11–25.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Claflin RF. Healing of disturbed and undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc 1936; 23: 945–959.
10.14219/jada.archive.1936.0127
Google Scholar
12 Boyne PJ. Osseous repair of the postextraction alveolus in man. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 21: 805–813.
10.1016/0030-4220(66)90104-6
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 Lang NP, Araujo M, Karring T. Alveolar bone formation. In: J Lindhe, T Karring, NP Lang, eds. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003: 866–896.
Google Scholar
14 Leblebicioglu B, Ersanli S, Karabuda C, Tosun T, Gokdeniz H. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 385–390.
10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.385
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Palma VC, Magro-Filho O, de Oliveria JA, Lundgren S, Salata LA, Sennerby L. Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study in primates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8: 11–24.
10.2310/j.6480.2005.00026.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Chen TW, Chang HS, Leung KW, Lai YL, Kao SY. Implant placement immediately after the lateral approach of the trap door window procedure to create a maxillary sinus lift without bone grafting: a 2-year retrospective evaluation of 47 implants in 33 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 2324–2328.
10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.649
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Hatano N, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation and peripheral venous blood for implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 150–155.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00043.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Nedir R, Bischof M, Vazquez L, Nurdin N, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting material: 3-year results of a prospective pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 701–707.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01696.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19 Winter AA, Pollack S, Odrich RB. Placement of implants in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla using localized management of the sinus floor: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 687–695.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Brager U, Gerber C, Joss A, et al. Patterns of tissue remodeling after placement of ITIs dental implants using an osteotome technique: a longitudinal radiographic case cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 158–166.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00988.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21 Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 339–345.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume15, Issue2

April 2013

Pages 243-250

Localized Management of Sinus Floor Technique for Implant Placement in Fresh Molar Sockets

ABSTRACT

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley