Volume 27, Issue 1 pp. 40-45

Traumatic dental injuries during anaesthesia. Part II: Medico-legal evaluation and liability

Rosa Maria Gaudio

Rosa Maria Gaudio

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Sezione di Medicina Legale Università degli Studi di Ferrara

Search for more papers by this author
Stefania Barbieri

Stefania Barbieri

Dipartimento di Farmacologia e Anestesia, Clinica di Anestesia e Medicina Intensiva Università degli Studi di Padova

Search for more papers by this author
Paolo Feltracco

Paolo Feltracco

Dipartimento di Farmacologia e Anestesia, Clinica di Anestesia e Medicina Intensiva Università degli Studi di Padova

Search for more papers by this author
Letizia Tiano

Letizia Tiano

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Sezione di Medicina Legale Università degli Studi di Ferrara

Search for more papers by this author
Helmut Galligioni

Helmut Galligioni

Dipartimento di Farmacologia e Anestesia, Clinica di Anestesia e Medicina Intensiva Università degli Studi di Padova

Search for more papers by this author
Manuela Uberti

Manuela Uberti

Unit of Legal Insurance Office University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Carlo Ori

Carlo Ori

Dipartimento di Farmacologia e Anestesia, Clinica di Anestesia e Medicina Intensiva Università degli Studi di Padova

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Maria Avato

Francesco Maria Avato

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Sezione di Medicina Legale Università degli Studi di Ferrara

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 January 2011
Citations: 38
Rosa Maria Gaudio, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Sezione di Medicina Legale Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Tel.: +39 05 3245 5556; 5528
Fax: +39 05 3245 5560
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract – Introduction: Claims for tooth damage following intubation are increasing. An anaesthetic chart (AC) has been proposed to describe patient’s pre-existent dental diseases and any possible lesions caused during intubation and extubation. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 235 cases of dental lesions reported in litigation files from January 2000 to June 2009. Based on preoperative oral inspection the anaesthetist decided whether or not to use a protective aid. Two different tooth protectors were applied: (i) a standard mouthguard and (ii) silicone impression putty. Results: The study population consisted of 110 female (age 6–88 years) and 125 male patients (11–90 years) patients. In 66% of cases greater risk of perianesthetic dental injury was reported in the AC due to pre-existing poor dentition. In intubation procedures without protective devices dental subluxation/luxation occurred in 55% of patients, dental avulsion in 43%, exfoliation in 2%, and soft tissue damage in five patients. One patient suffered from transient facial nerve paralysis. The costs of treatments and of impression materials, as well as the total value of compensation for injuries are reported. Discussion: Definition and demonstrability of damages on the AC is important in order to separate the cases worthy of compensation from the non-compensable ones, as to evaluate the possibility of solving the litigation by extrajudicial channels. There are cases in which, based on AC reporting and device adoption the damage resulted to be compensable, but the costs were defined on different estimates of lesions. The use of a protective device makes it possible to down-modulate the damage compensation. Conclusion: The analysis of litigation records and ‘incident reports’ has suggested that the choice of accurate proceeding and the use of protection aids could reduce the number of claims, insurance premiums and the costs of litigation process, thus improving physician-patient relationship.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.