Volume 26, Issue 6 pp. 303-310

Urocanic acid suppresses induction of immunity in human skin

Mark V. Dahl

Mark V. Dahl

Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gerald N. McEwen Jr

Gerald N. McEwen Jr

The Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
H. Irving Katz

H. Irving Katz

Department of Dermatology, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 November 2010
Citations: 12
Correspondence:
Mark V. Dahl, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
e-mail: [email protected]

Conflicts of interest:
G. N. M. was employed by the Cosmetic, Fragrance, and Toiletry Association, which sponsored the study.

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Trans-urocanic acid is isomerized to cis-urocanic acid (C-UCA) by ultraviolet radiation. C-UCA suppresses immunity in vitro and in vivo in animals; its effect on human skin is unknown. We sought to determine whether its topical application to normal skin suppresses induction of immunity to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB).

Methods: Forty subjects applied C-UCA (0%, 0.02%, 0.2%, or 2%) for 17 days. A 40-mcg dose of DNCB was then applied to induce immunity. Subjects were challenged for immunity at 6-week follow-up by occluding doses of DNCB (0, 3.125, 6.25, or 12.5 mcg) on untreated normal skin. Induced immunity was measured by area of erythema and induration 2 and 4 days postchallenge.

Results: No significant differences were found in incidence of sensitization by C-UCA concentration (P=.59). DNCB sensitization developed in all 10 subjects induced through 0% C-UCA (placebo); only 23 of 30 patients were sensitized through skin treated with C-UCA. Mean areas of erythema and induration induced through C-UCA-treated skin were less than those in controls (P<0.05). The number of Langerhans cells in C-UCA-treated skin was unaffected. Laboratory tests of immune function and lymphocyte numbers were unchanged.

Conclusion: Topically applied C-UCA blunts normal induction responses to a cutaneous sensitizer.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.