Volume 59, Issue 4 pp. 212-219

Evaluation of the effect of the specific CCR1 antagonist CP-481715 on the clinical and cellular responses observed following epicutaneous nickel challenge in human subjects

Jeanett Borregaard

Jeanett Borregaard

Unit of Clinical Pharmacology

Search for more papers by this author
Lone Skov

Corresponding Author

Lone Skov

Department of Dermatology, Gentofte Hospital, Niels Andersens Vej 65, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark

Lone Skov
Department of Dermatology
Gentofte Hospital
Niels Andersens Vej 65
2900 Hellerup
Denmark
Tel: +45 39773205
Fax: +45 39777101
e-mail:
[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Lisy Wang

Lisy Wang

Pfizer, Global Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340

Search for more papers by this author
Naitee Ting

Naitee Ting

Pfizer, Global Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340

Search for more papers by this author
Cunshan Wang

Cunshan Wang

Pfizer, Global Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa A. Beck

Lisa A. Beck

University of Rochester, Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jesper Sonne

Jesper Sonne

Unit of Clinical Pharmacology

Search for more papers by this author
Alan Clucas

Alan Clucas

Pfizer, Global Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 September 2008
Citations: 13

Abstract

Background: The CC-chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) is thought to be involved in recruitment of inflammatory cells in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). CP-481715 is a specific antagonist of CCR1.

Objectives: To determine the inhibitory effects of CP-418 715 in ACD by evaluating the clinical signs and cellular infiltration in skin biopsies following epicutaneous nickel challenge in allergic subjects.

Subjects/Methods: In this phase 1/2 study, 40 subjects were randomized to 5 days of treatment in four parallel groups (placebo three times daily (TID), placebo once daily (QD), 1000 mg CP-418 715 TID, and 3000 mg CP-418 715 QD). Twenty-four hours after the first drug administration, nickel sulfate patches were applied on subjects’ backs and removed 48 hours later.

Results: Pretreatment with 1000 mg CP-481715 TID resulted in significant reductions in visual scores of the nickel reactions (P = 0.01). Instrumentally measured erythema tended to decrease in the CP-481715 mg TID group (P = 0.06). No differences were noted between the 3000 mg CP-481715 mg QD group and pooled placebo. No significant differences were found for immunohistological cell counts. CP-418 715 was generally safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions: Blocking of CCR1 only partly inhibited clinical manifestations of ACD. Several chemokine receptors are likely relevant for the cellular influx observed in ACD lesions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.