Volume 22, Issue 10 pp. 1151-1156

Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography

Matheus Alves Jr

Matheus Alves Jr

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Carolina Baratieri

Carolina Baratieri

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Lincoln Issamu Nojima

Lincoln Issamu Nojima

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 February 2011
Citations: 41
Corresponding author:
Lincoln Issamu Nojima
Avenida Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 325
Ilha do Fundão
Rio de Janeiro CEP: 21941-617
Brazil
Tel.: +55 21 2590 2727
Fax: + 55 21 2590 9771
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives: To assess, through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the mini-implants' stability and behaviour when submitted to orthodontic force during upper molars' intrusion.

Material and methods: Forty-one mini-implants were divided into two groups: 30 in the buccal and palatal mini-implants group (BPMI), inserted into buccal and palatal sides, and 11 in the midpalatal mini-implants group (MPMI), inserted into midpalatal suture. One day after insertion, a 200 gf was applied on the mini-implants during a 5-month period. CBCT was performed twice: before force application (CBCT 1) and 5 months later (CBCT 2). For mini-implant displacement assessment, the distance of mini-implants' head (HMI) and tail (TMI) to coronal, sagittal and axial planes was measured at CBCT 1 and 2.

Results: For the BPMI group, the displacement rate was statistically significant (P<0.05) in all three dimensions for both the head and the tail. For the MPMI group, the displacement rate was statistically significant (P<0.05) only in the antero-posterior (head and tail) and vertical (head) dimensions.

Conclusions: Buccal, palatal and midpalatal mini-implants showed some displacement (mean value ≤0.78) when submitted to force, although they are aimed to provide stable skeletal anchorage.

To cite this article:
Alves M Jr, Baratieri C, Nojima LI. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 1151–1156.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02092.x

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.