Volume 22, Issue 10 pp. 1168-1171

Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Alessandro Lourenço Januário

Alessandro Lourenço Januário

Private Practice, Brasília, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Wagner Rodrigues Duarte

Wagner Rodrigues Duarte

Department of Dentistry, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Mauricio Barriviera

Mauricio Barriviera

Department of Oral Radiology, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Juliana Cristina Mesti

Juliana Cristina Mesti

Private Practice, Maringá, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Mauricio Guimarães Araújo

Mauricio Guimarães Araújo

Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Jan Lindhe

Jan Lindhe

Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 February 2011
Citations: 209
Correspondence to:
Alessandro Lourenço Januário
SHIS QL 14 Conjunto 6 casa 18
Brasília/DF
Brazil
Tel.: +55 61 9982 7980
Fax: +55 61 3245 7700
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective: To determine the thickness of the facial bone wall in the anterior dentition of the maxilla and at different locations apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).

Material and methods: Two-hundred and fifty subjects, aged between 17 and 66 years, with all maxillary front teeth present were included. Written informed consents were obtained. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed with the iCAT unit. This examination included all tooth and edentulous sites in the dentition. The images were acquired by means of the iCAT software and processed by a computer. Measurements of the (i) distance between the CEJ and the facial bone crest and (ii) the thickness of the facial bone wall were performed. The bone wall dimensions were assessed at three different positions in relation to the facial bone crest, i.e., at distances of 1, 3, and 5 mm apical to the crest.

Results: The measurements demonstrated that (i) the distance between the CEJ and the facial bone crest varied between 1.6 and 3 mm and (ii) the facial bone wall in most locations in all tooth sites examined was ≤1 mm thick and that close to 50% of sites had a bone wall thickness that was ≤0.5 mm.

Conclusion: Most tooth sites in the anterior maxilla have a thin facial bone wall. Such a thin bone wall may undergo marked dimensional diminution following tooth extraction. This fact must be considered before tooth removal and the planning of rehabilitation in the anterior segment of the dentition in the maxilla.

To cite this article:
Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 1168–1171
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.