RETRACTED: Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment
Retraction(s) for this article
-
RETRACTION: Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment
- Volume 35Issue 6Clinical Oral Implants Research
- pages: 681-681
- First Published online: May 21, 2024
J. L. Calvo-Guirado
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorA. J. Ortiz-Ruiz
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorB. Negri
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorL. López-Marí
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorC. Rodriguez-Barba
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJ. L. Calvo-Guirado
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorA. J. Ortiz-Ruiz
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorB. Negri
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorL. López-Marí
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorC. Rodriguez-Barba
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate crestal bone resorption and bone apposition resulting from immediate post-extraction implants in the canine mandible, comparing a conditioned sandblasted acid-etched implant surface with a non-conditioned standard sandblasted implant surface.
Material and methods: In this experimental study, third and fourth premolars and distal roots of first molars were extracted bilaterally from six Beagle dog mandibles. Each side of the mandible received three assigned dental implants, with the conditioned surface (CS) on the right side and the non-conditioned surface (NCS) on the left. The dogs were sacrificed at 2 (n=2), 4 (n=2) and 12 weeks (n=2) after implant placement.
Results: The microscopic healing patterns at 2, 4 and 12 weeks for both implant types (CS and NCS) yielded similar qualitative bone findings. The mean crestal bone resorption was found to be greater for all implants with NCS (2.28±1.9 mm) than CS (1.21±1.05 mm) at 12 weeks. The mean percentage of newly formed bone in contact with implants was greater in implants CS (44.67±0.19%) than with the NCS (36,6±0.11%). There was less bone resorption with the CS than the NCS.
Conclusion: The data show significantly more bone apposition (8% more) and less crestal bone resorption (1.07 mm) with the CS than with the NCS after 12 weeks of healing. This CS can reduce the healing period and increase bone apposition in immediate implant placements.
To cite this article: Calvo-Guirado JL, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Negri B, López-Marí L, Rodriguez-Barba C, Schlottig F. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 308–315.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01841.x
References
- Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., Linder, E., Lang, N.P. & Lindhe, J. (2004) Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 381–392.
- Albrektsson, T., Brånemark, P.I., Hansson, H.A. & Lindström, J. (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 52: 155–170.
- Araújo, M.G. & Lindhe, J. (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 212–218.
- Araújo, M.G., Sukekava, F., Wennström, J.L. & Lindhe, J. (2005) Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 645–652.
- Barros, R.R.M., Novaes, A.B. Jr. & Papapelxiou, V. (2009) Buccal bone remodeling after immediate implantation with a flap or flapless approach. A pilot study in dogs. Titanium 1: 45–51.
- Becker, B.E., Becker, W., Ricci, A. & Geurs, N. (1998) A prospective clinical trial of endosseous screw-shaped implants placed at the time of tooth extraction without augmentation. Journal of Periodontology 69: 920–926.
- Berglundh, T., Abrahamsson, I., Lang, N.P. & Lindhe, J. (2003) De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 251–262.
- Bornstein, M.M., Lussi, A., Schmid, B., Belser, U.C. & Buser, D. (2003) Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 18: 659–666.
- Bornstein, M.M., Schmid, B., Belser, U.C., Lussi, A. & Buser, D. (2005) Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 631–638.
- Bornstein, M.M., Valderrama, P., Jones, A.A., Wilson, T.G., Seibl, R. & Cochran, D.L. (2008) Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 233–241.
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T., Buser, D. & Lindhe, J. (2003a) Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 1–9.
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T., Buser, D. & Lindhe, J. (2003b) The jumping distance revisited: an experimental study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 35–42.
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T. & Lindhe, J. (2004a) The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of a marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants. An experimental study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 285–292.
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T. & Lindhe, J. (2004b) Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31: 309–317.
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T. & Lindhe, J. (2004c) Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31: 820–828.
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T., Persson, L.G. & Lindhe, J. (2005) Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 448–455.
- Botticelli, D., Persson, L.G., Lindhe, J. & Berglundh, T. (2006) Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 17: 351–358.
- Brägger, U., Hämmerle, C.H. & Lang, N.P. (1999) Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration (II). A cross-sectional study comparing the clinical outcome one year after immediate to standard implant placement. Clinical Oral Implant Research 7: 268–276.
- Buser, D., Broggini, N., Wieland, M., Schenk, R.K., Denzer, A.J., Cochran, D.L., Hoffmann, B., Lussi, A. & Steinemann, S.G. (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. Journal of Dental Research 83: 529–533.
- Buser, D., Mericske-Stern, R., Dula, K. & Lang, N.P. (1999) Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Advances in Dental Research 13: 153–161.
- Cardaropoli, G., Araújo, M., Hayacibara, R., Sukekava, F. & Lindhe, J. (2005) Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced - augmented and non-augmented - defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 435–440.
- Cardaropoli, G., Araújo, M. & Lindhe, J. (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 30: 809–818.
- Cardaropoli, G., Lekholm, U. & Wennström, J.L. (2006) Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 17: 165–171.
- Choi, B.H., Li, J., Kim, H.S., Ko, C.Y., Jeong, S.M. & Xuan, F. (2008) Comparison of submerged and non-submerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 105: 561–565.
- Chung, S.H., Heo, S.J., Koak, J.Y., Kim, S.K., Lee, J.B., Han, J.S., Han, C.H., Rhyu, I.C. & Lee, S.J. (2008) Effects of implant geometry and surface treatment on osseointegration after functional loading: a dog study. Journal of Oral Rehabilation. 35: 229–236.
- Cochran, D.L., Buser, D., Ten Bruggenkate, C.M., Weingart, D., Taylor, T.M., Bernard, J.P., Peters, F. & Simpson, J.P. (2002) The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 144–153.
- Donath, K. & Breuner, G. (1982) A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. Journal of Oral Pathology 11: 318–326.
- Grunder, U., Polizzi, G., Goené, R., Hatano, N., Henry, P., Jackson, W.J., Kawamura, K., Köhler, S., Renouard, F., Rosenberg, R., Triplett, G., Werbitt, M. & Lithner, B. (1999) A 3-year prospective multi-center follow-up report on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 14: 210–216.
- Karnovsky, M.J. (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 27: 137A–138A.
- Kilpadi, D.V. & Lemons, J.E. (1994) Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 28: 1419–1425.
- Lazzara, R.J. (1989) Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 9: 332–343.
- Masaki, C., Schneider, G.B., Zaharias, R., Seabold, D. & Stanford, C. (2005) Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 650–656.
- Matsuo, M., Nakamua, T., Kishi, Y. & Takahashi, K. (2000) Microvascular changes after placement of titanium implants: scanning electron microscopy observations of machined and titanium plasma sprayed implants in dogs. Journal of Periodontology 70: 1330–1338.
- Novaes, A.B. Jr., Souza, S.L.S., Oliveira, P.T. & Souza, A.M.M.S. (2002) Histomorphometric analysis of the bone implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 17: 377–383.
- Plakco, H.E., Mishra, S., Weimer, J.J. & Lucas, L.C. (2000) Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 15: 355–363.
- Roccuzzo, M., Bunino, M., Prioglio, F. & Bianchi, S.D. (2001) Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 572–578.
- Rupp, F., Scheideler, L., Olshanska, N., De Wild, M., Wieland, M. & Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2006) Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A 76: 323–334.
- Sammons, R.L., Lumbikanonda, N., Gross, M. & Cantzler, P. (2005) Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 657–666.
- Schenk, R.K., Olah, A.J. & Hermann, W. (1984) Preparation of calcified tissues for light microscopy. In: G.R. Dickson, ed. Methods of Calcified Tissue Preparation. 1st edition, 1–56. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV.P.
- Schropp, L., Wenzel, A., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. (2003) Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 23: 313–323.
- Schwartz-Arad, D. & Chaushu, G. (1997a) Placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: 4 to 7 years retrospective evaluation of 95 immediate implants. Journal of Periodontology 68: 1110–1116.
- Schwartz-Arad, D. & Chaushu, G. (1997b) The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. Journal of Periodontology 68: 915–923.
- Schwarz, F., Herten, M., Sager, M., Wieland, M., Dard, M. & Becker, J. (2007) Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 18: 481–488.
- Sennerby, L., Odman, J., Lekholm, U. & Thilander, B. (1993) Tissue reactions towards titanium implants inserted in growing jaws. A histological study in the pig. Clinical Oral Implants Research 4: 65–75.
- Spray, J.R., Black, C.G., Morris, H.F. & Ochi, S. (2000) The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Annals of Periodontology 5: 119–128.
- Zhao, G., Schwartz, Z., Wieland, M., Rupp, F., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Cochran, D.L. & Boyan, B.D. (2005) High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. Journal of Biomedicals Materials Research A 74: 49–58.
- Zhao, X., Liu, X. & Ding, C. (2005) Acid-induced bioactive titania surface. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A 75: 888–894.