Volume 20, Issue 7 pp. 737-741

Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses

Letícia Borges Jacques

Letícia Borges Jacques

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, RS, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Márcio Silva Moura

Márcio Silva Moura

São Paulo State University, Bauru-SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Valdey Suedam

Valdey Suedam

Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru-SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Edson Antonio Capello Souza

Edson Antonio Capello Souza

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bauru School of Engineering, São Paulo State University, Bauru-SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
José Henrique Rubo

José Henrique Rubo

Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru-SP, Brazil.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 June 2009
Citations: 33
Correspondence to:
Jose H. Rubo
Al. Octávio Pinheiro Brisola
9-75 Bauru
São Paulo, CEP 17012 901
Brazil
Tel.: +55 14 3235 8231
Fax: +55 14 3235 8277
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the stress distribution on components of a mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis with frameworks cast in cobalt–chromium (Co–Cr) or palladium–silver (Pd–Ag) alloys, according to the cantilever length.

Material and methods: Frameworks were fabricated on (Co–Cr) and (Pd–Ag) alloys and screwed into standard abutments positioned on a master-cast containing five implant replicas. Two linear strain gauges were fixed on the mesial and distal aspects of each abutment to capture deformation. A vertical static load of 100 N was applied to the cantilever arm at the distances of 10, 15, and 20 mm from the center of the distal abutment and the absolute values of specific deformation were recorded.

Results: Different patterns of abutment deformation were observed according to the framework alloy. The Co–Cr alloy framework resulted in higher levels of abutment deformation than the silver–palladium alloy framework. Abutment deformation was higher with longer cantilever extensions.

Conclusion: Physical properties of the alloys used for framework interfere with abutment deformations patterns. Excessively long cantilever extensions must be avoided.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.