Volume 20, Issue 8 pp. 767-771

Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging

Yan Hua

Yan Hua

Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Olivia Nackaerts

Olivia Nackaerts

Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Joke Duyck

Joke Duyck

Biomat Laboratory, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Frederik Maes

Frederik Maes

ESAT-PSI, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Reinhilde Jacobs

Reinhilde Jacobs

Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 July 2009
Citations: 124
Correspondence to:
Reinhilde Jacobs
Oral Imaging Center,
School of Dentistry
Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Faculty of Medicine
Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven
Kapucijnenvoer
7, 3000 Leuven
Belgium
Tel/Fax: +32 16 332410
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy of fractal analysis and morphometry for bone quality assessment as measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Material and methods: Nineteen mandibular bone samples were used for the creation of artificial bone lesions (n=5) or decalcification (n=12) to simulate osteoporosis; two samples were used as controls. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and DXA scans were made before and after processing the samples. The image data obtained from the CBCT scans were used to calculate the mean fractal dimension (FD), bone area and density (morphometric analysis) of the samples. Bone mineral density (BMD) was obtained from the DXA scans and set as a reference value for bone quality. The correlation between BMD and FD and between BMD and morphometric results were calculated.

Results: A significant correlation between FD and BMD (ρ=+0.71 to +0.75; P<0.05) was observed. Bone area and BMD of the specimens (ρ=+0.69 to +0.85; P<0.05) were also significantly related, in contrast to the density analysis, for which no significant correlation to BMD was found.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that fractal analysis and bone area measurement have potential to evaluate bone quality on CBCT images, while density measurement does not seem to be valid.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.