Volume 20, Issue 2 pp. 145-150

Effects of Simvastatin on bone healing around titanium implants in osteoporotic rats

Zhibin Du

Zhibin Du

Department of Oral Implant, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jiang Chen

Jiang Chen

Department of Oral Implant, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Fuhua Yan

Fuhua Yan

Department of Oral Implant, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yin Xiao

Yin Xiao

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 January 2009
Citations: 99
Correspondence to:
Jiang Chen
Department of Oral Implant
Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou
China
Tel.: +86 591 83754882
Fax: +86 591 83700838
e-mail: [email protected]
Fuhua Yan
Department of Periodontology
School of Stomatology
Fujian Medical University
246 Yangqio Zhong Road
Fuzhou, Fujian 350002
China
Tel.: +86 591 83736426
Fax: +86 591 83700838
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives: Osteoporosis is known to impair the process of implant osseointegration. The recent discovery that statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) act as bone anabolic agents suggests that statins can be used as potential agents in the treatment of osteoporosis. Therefore, we hypothesized that statins will promote osteogenesis around titanium implants in subjects with osteoporosis.

Material and methods: Fifty-four female Sprague Dawley rats, aged 3 months old, were randomly divided into three groups: Sham-operated group (SHAM; n=18), ovariectomized group (OVX; n=18), and ovariectomized with Simvastatin treatment group (OVX+SIM; n=18). Fifty-six days after being ovariectomized (OVX), screw-shaped titanium implants were inserted into the tibiae. Simvastatin was administered orally at 5 mg/kg each day after the placement of the implant in the OVX+SIM group. The animals were sacrificed at either 28 or 84 days after implantation and the undecalcified tissue sections were obtained. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area (BA) within the limits of implant threads were measured around the cortical (zone A) and cancellous (zone B) bone regions. Furthermore, bone density (BD) of zone B in a 500 μm wide zone lateral to the implants was also measured.

Results: There were no significant differences in BIC and BA measurements in zone A in any of the three groups at either 28 or 84 days after implantation (P>0.05). By contrast, in zone B, significant differences in the measurement of BIC, BA, and BD were observed at 28 and 84 days between all three groups. Bone healing decreased with lower BIC, BA, and BD around implant in OVX group compared with other two groups, and Simvastatin reversed the negative effect of OVX on bone healing around implants with the improvement of BIC, BA, and BD in zone B.

Conclusion: Osteoporosis can significantly influence bone healing in the cancellous bone around titanium implants and Simvastatin was shown to significantly improve the osseointegration of pure titanium implants in osteoporotic rats.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.