Volume 72, Issue 4 pp. 385-391
Full Access

The effect of an increased ratio of carbidopa to levodopa on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa

S. Kaakkola

S. Kaakkola

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
P. T. Männistö

Corresponding Author

P. T. Männistö

Orion Pharmaceutical Co., Research Center, Espoo, Finland

P. T. Männistö, M.D. Orion Pharmaceutical Co. Research Center P. O. Box 65 SF-02101 Espoo FinlandSearch for more papers by this author
E. Nissinen

E. Nissinen

Orion Pharmaceutical Co., Research Center, Espoo, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
A. Vuorela

A. Vuorela

Orion Pharmaceutical Co., Research Center, Espoo, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
R. Mäntylä

R. Mäntylä

Orion Pharmaceutical Co., Research Center, Espoo, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: October 1985
Citations: 24

Abstract

ABSTRACT – A randomized, cross-over study was designed to compare the effects of an increased ratio (from 1:10 to 1:4) of carbidopa to levodopa on the fate of levodopa and carbidopa in 11 healthy subjects. Four combinations of carbidopa/levodopa (10 mg/100 mg, 25 mg/100 mg, 25 mg/250 mg, 62.5/250 mg) were used. Plasma levodopa, carbidopa, dopamine and dopac concentrations as well as urinary excretions of levodopa and dopac were determined by a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection after a single carbidopa/levodopa tablet. As the ratio of carbidopa to levodopa increased, there was a significant increase in apparent t1/2 and AUC values of levodopa. At the same time the urinary excretion of levodopa increased and that of dopac decreased. The plasma ratios of levodopa/dopamine and levodopa/dopac and the urinary ratio of levodopa/dopac also increased. There were less subjective side-effects in the 1:4 groups than in the 1:10 groups. It is concluded that increasing the amount of carbidopa in relation to levodopa may be beneficial and further clinical studies are clearly indicated.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.