Volume 64, Issue 1 pp. 134-136
Short Communication

‘Real-time’ PCR-based detection of Coxiella burnetii using conventional techniques

Dimitrios Frangoulidis

Corresponding Author

Dimitrios Frangoulidis

Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany

Correspondence: Dimitrios Frangoulidis, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 Munich, Germany. Tel.: +49 89 3168 3869; fax: +49 89 3168 3983; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Hermann Meyer

Hermann Meyer

Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Claudia Kahlhofer

Claudia Kahlhofer

Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Wolf D. Splettstoesser

Wolf D. Splettstoesser

Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 November 2011
Citations: 1

Abstract

The diagnosis of Q fever (Coxiella burnetii infection) relies primarily on the serological detection of specific antibodies. Recently, PCR-based methods have been introduced in diagnostic laboratories. Unfortunately, the fastest and most reliable ‘real-time’ detection method, which employs the ‘online’ detection of target nucleotide sequences while the amplification process is still in progress, requires expensive devices and consumables. In this study, we present a simple method that combines the simplicity of conventional PCR with new technical and methodical enhancements, resulting in a fast, specific and easy method for the molecular detection of C. burnetii. A collection of C. burnetii reference strains was tested with the modified conventional gel-based PCR approach applying a particluar PCR buffer (QIAGEN® Fast Cycling PCR kit) and using a closed ready-to-use gel-cassette-system (FlashGel®) for the visualization of specific PCR products. The modified conventional PCR method reached nearly the speed of the LightCycler® HybProbe real-time PCR assay (120 vs. 90 min) and showed equal sensitivity and specificity. The general cost per PCR run was 25% less than that for the LightCycler method. These improvements make this method suitable for small laboratories with limited resources and for deployable PCR diagnostics in field laboratories.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.