Volume 25, Issue 1 pp. 1-9

Nonculturability: adaptation or debilitation?

Diane McDougald

Diane McDougald

School of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, N.S.W. 2052, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Scott A Rice

Scott A Rice

School of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, N.S.W. 2052, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Dieter Weichart

Dieter Weichart

Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DA, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Staffan Kjelleberg

Corresponding Author

Staffan Kjelleberg

School of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, N.S.W. 2052, Australia

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 (2) 9385 2102; Fax: +61 (2) 9385 1591; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 January 2006
Citations: 55

Abstract

Investigation of bacterial survival in natural environments has indicated that some organisms lose culturability on appropriate media under certain conditions and yet still exhibit signs of metabolic activity and thus viability. This reproducible loss of culturability by many bacterial species led to the description of bacterial cells in this state as ‘viable but nonculturable’ (VBNC). It is suggested that the VBNC state is part of the life cycle of non-differentiating bacteria induced by environmental stress. The purpose of this review is to summarize some of the reports which support and refute the hypothesis that the VBNC response is a programmed response. Methods currently used in the determination of viability will be discussed with respect to their advantages and disadvantages. Reports which indicate resuscitation in vitro and in vivo, as well as those that show retention of infectivity and pathogenicity in the case of pathogenic organisms are presented as well.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.