HOW DISCRETE ARE OAK SPECIES? INSIGHTS FROM A HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN QUERCUS GRISEA AND QUERCUS GAMBELII
Daniel J. Howard
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorRalph W. Preszler
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorJoseph Williams
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602
Search for more papers by this authorSandra Fenchel
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam J. Boecklen
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorDaniel J. Howard
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorRalph W. Preszler
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorJoseph Williams
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602
Search for more papers by this authorSandra Fenchel
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam J. Boecklen
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The white oaks Quercus gambelii and Q. grisea overlap in distribution in New Mexico and Arizona. Within the region of overlap, there are numerous instances of contact between the two taxa. In some areas of contact morphologically, intermediate trees are common, whereas in others, morphologically intermediate trees are rare or absent. We describe a set of RAPD markers that distinguish between the two species and use these markers to examine patterns of gene exchange in an area of contact in the San Mateo Mountains of New Mexico. The markers are highly coincident with morphology and confirm that hybridization between the two species takes place. Despite the occurrence of hybrids, both species remain distinct, even in areas of sympatry, and marker exchange appears to be limited.
Literature Cited.
- Aas, G. 1993. Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: A contribution to the hybrid controversy. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50: 107s–113s.
- Aguilar, F. M., and W. J. Boecklen. 1992. Patterns of herbivory in the Quercus grisea × Quercus gambelii species complex. Oikos 64: 498–504.
- Anderson, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New York.
10.5962/bhl.title.4553 Google Scholar
- Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
- Bacilieri, R., G. Roussel, and A. Ducousso. 1993. Hybridization and mating system in a mixed stand of sessile and pedunculate oak. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50: 122s–127s.
- Barton, N. H., and K. S. Gale. 1993. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. Pp. 13–45 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
- Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 113–148.
- Boecklen, W. J., and R. Spellenberg. 1990. Structure of herbivore communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85: 92–100.
- Butlin, R. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pp. 158–179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
- Cain, M. L., and L. W. Murray. 1994. Non-linear regression models to estimate the size of DNA fragments. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 10: 677–680.
- Cottam, W. P., J. M. Tucker, and F. S. Santamour. 1982. Oak Hybridization at the University of Utah. State Arboretum of Utah Publ. No. 1. Salt Lake City, UT.
- DePamphilis, C. W., and R. Wyatt. 1990. Electrophoretic confirmation of interspecific hybridization in Aesculus (Hippocastanaceae) and the genetic structure of a. broad hybrid zone. Evolution 44: 1295–1317.
- W. J. Dixon, M. B. Brown, L. Engelman, 1990. MDP Statistical software manual. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
- Ducousso, A., H. Michaud, and R. Lumaret. 1993. Reproduction and gene flow in the genus Quercus L. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50: 91s–106s.
- Feder, J. H. 1979. Natural hybridization and genetic divergence between the toads Bufo boreas and Bufo punctatus. Evolution 33: 1089–1097.
- Floate, K. D., and T. G. Whitham. 1993. The “hybrid bridge” hypothesis: Host shifting via plant hybrid swarms. Am. Nat. 141: 651–662.
- Floate, K. D., and T. G. Whitham. 1994. Aphid-ant interaction reduces chrysomelid herbivory in a cottonwood hybrid zone. Oecologia 97: 215–221.
- Gaylord, E. S., R. W. Preszler, and W. J. Boecklen. 1996. Interactions between host plants, endophytic fungi, and a phytophagous insect in an oak (Quercus grisea × Q. gambelii) hybrid zone. Oecologia 105: 336–342.
- Guttman, S. I., and L. A. Weigt. 1989. Electrophoretic evidence of relationships among Quercus (oaks) of eastern North America. Can. J. Bot. 67: 339–351.
- Harrison, R. G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56: 337–349.
- Harrison, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: Windows on evolutionary process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 69–128.
- Harrison, R. G. 1993. Hybrids and hybrid zones: Historical Perspective. Pp. 3–12 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
10.1093/oso/9780195069174.003.0001 Google Scholar
- Harrison, R. G., and D. M. Rand. 1989. Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries. Pp. 111–133 in D. Otte and J. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
- Howard, D.J. 1983. Electrophoretic survey of eastern North American Allonemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): Evolutionary relationships and the discovery of three new species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76: 1014–1021.
- Howard, D.J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40: 34–43.
- Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: The origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46–69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
- Howard, D.J., and G. L. Waring. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45: 1120–1135.
- Jones, E. W. 1959. Biological flora of the British Isles: Quercus L. J. Ecol. 47: 169–222.
- Kim, Z. S., S. W. Lee, and J. O. Hyun. 1993. Allozyme variation in six native oak species in Korea. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50: 253–260.
- Little, E. L., Jr. 1976. Atlas of United States trees. Minor Hardwoods. US Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 1314.
- Martinsen, G. D., and T. G. Whitham. 1994. More birds nest in hybrid cottonwood trees. Wilson Bull. 106: 474–481.
- Muller, C. H. 1952. Ecological control of hybridization in Quercus: A factor in the mechanism of evolution. Evolution 6: 147–161.
- Nixon, K. C. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50: 25s–34s.
- Palmer, E. J. 1948. Hybrid oaks of North America. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 29: 1–48.
- Patton, J. L., J. C. Hafner, and M. F. Smith. 1979. Hybrid zones in Thomomys bottae pocket gophers: Genetic, phenetic, and ecologic concordance patterns. Evolution 33: 860–876.
- Rand, D. M., and R. G. Harrison. 1989. Ecological genetics of a mosaic hybrid zone: Mitochondrial, nuclear, and reproductive differentiation of crickets by soil type. Evolution 43: 432–449.
- Rieseberg, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. Am. J. Bot. 82: 944–953.
- Rieseberg, L. H., and J. F. Wendel. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Pp. 70–109 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
- Rieseberg, L. H., S. Zona, L. Aberbom, and T. D. Martin. 1989. Hybridization in the island endemic, Catalina mahogany. Conserv. Biol. 3: 52–58.
- Rieseberg, L. H., H. C. Choi, and D. Ham. 1991. Differential cytoplasmic versus nuclear introgression in Helianthus. J. Hered. 82: 489–493.
- Rushton, B. S. 1993. Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50: 73s–90s.
- Shoemaker, D. D., K. G. Ross, and M. L. Arnold. 1994. Development of RAPD markers in 2 introduced fire ants, Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri, and their application to the study of a hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 3: 531–539.
- Spellenberg, R. 1995. On the hybrid nature of Quercus basaseachicensis (Fagaceae, Sect. Quercus). Sida 16: 427–437.
- Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
10.7312/steb94536 Google Scholar
- Stebbins, G. L., E. B. Matzke, and C. Epling. 1947. Hybridization in a population of Quercus marilandica and Q. ilicifolia. Evolution 1: 79–88.
- Stucky, J. M. 1985. Pollination systems of sympatric Ipomoea hederacea and Ipomoea purpurea and the significance of interspecific pollen flow. Am. J. Bot. 72: 32–43.
- Trelease, W. 1924. The American oaks. Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20: 1–255.
- Tucker, J. M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex I. A preliminary statement. Am. J. Bot. 48: 202–208.
- Van Devender, T. R., and W. G. Spaulding. 1979. Development of vegetation and climate in the southwestern United States. Science 204: 701–710.
- Van Valen, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233–239.
- Whitham, T. G. 1989. Plant hybrid zones as sinks for pests. Science 244: 1490–1493.
- Whitham, T. G., P. A. Morow, and B. M. Potts. 1994. Plant hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity: The herbivore community of two endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 97: 481–490.
- Whittemore, A. T. and B. A. Schaal. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 2540–2544.