Volume 56, Issue 1 pp. 150-154

Personality Disorders and Criminal Responsibility in the Spanish Supreme Court*

Susana Mohíno Ph.D.

Susana Mohíno Ph.D.

C.A.S.M. Benito Menni, Hospital Psiquiátrico, Unidad B, Calle Dr. Antoni Pujadas 38-C, San Benito Menni 1, 08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Search for more papers by this author
Amadeo Pujol M.D.

Amadeo Pujol M.D.

Chief of Clinical Forensic Medicine Service, Catalan Institute of Legal Medicine, Ciudad de la Justicia, Edificio G. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 111, 08014 Barcelona, Spain.

Search for more papers by this author
Itziar Idiaquez M.D.

Itziar Idiaquez M.D.

Clinical Forensic Medicine Service, Catalan Institute of Legal Medicine, Ciudad de la Justicia, Edificio G. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 111, 08014 Barcelona, Spain.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 September 2010
Citations: 7
Additional information and reprint requests:
Susana Mohíno, Ph.D.
Benito Menni CASM, Hospital Psiquiátrico, Unidad B,
C. Dr. Antoni Pujadas 38-C, San Benito Menni 1
08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat
Barcelona
Spain
E-mail: [email protected]

Presented in part as a poster at the 7th Congreso Nacional de Trastornos de Personalidad, June 2008, in Córdoba, Spain.

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study is to determine how personality disorders (PDs) are viewed in relation to criminal responsibility (CR) within the jurisprudence of the Spanish Supreme Court. All sentences with PD from 2000 to 2006 were included. The most frequently occurring PDs are cluster B and nonspecific disorders, alongside another Axis I disorder. The Spanish Supreme Court admitted appeals on 50%, and sentencing criteria were changed in 25% of the cases. The most frequent outcome was in the first instance a minor reduction in CR and second full CR being upheld. The borderline PD and the comorbidity between a PD and an Axis I disorder are the variables associated with the decrease in CR. The assessment of CR in PD should be undertaken using the diagnosis as a base taking into account other elements, such as the type of PD, its seriousness, comorbidity, and relationship with the criminal behavior on trial.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.