Volume 55, Issue 2 pp. 358-365

Comparison of the Performance of Two Methods for Height Estimation

Gerda Edelman M.Sc.

Gerda Edelman M.Sc.

Netherlands Forensic Institute, PO Box 24044, 2490 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
Ivo Alberink Ph.D.

Ivo Alberink Ph.D.

Netherlands Forensic Institute, PO Box 24044, 2490 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
Bart Hoogeboom M.Sc.

Bart Hoogeboom M.Sc.

Netherlands Forensic Institute, PO Box 24044, 2490 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2010
Citations: 16
Additional information and reprint requests:
Ivo Alberink, Ph.D.
Netherlands Forensic Institute
PO Box 24044
2490 AA Den Haag
The Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: In the case study, two methods of performing body height measurements in images are compared based on projective geometry and 3D modeling of the crime scene. Accuracy and stability of height estimations are tested using reconstruction images of test persons of known height. Given unchanged camera settings, predictions of both methods are accurate. However, as the camera had been moved in the case, new vanishing points and camera matches had to be created for the reconstruction images. 3D modeling still yielded accurate and stable estimations. Projective geometry produced incorrect predictions for test persons and unstable intervals for questioned persons. The latter is probably caused by the straight lines in the field of view being hard to discern. With the quality of material presented, which is representative for our case practice, using vanishing points may thus yield unstable results. The results underline the importance of performing validation experiments in casework.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.