Volume 42, Issue 1 pp. 78-83
Full Access

Chemorepellents in Paramecium and Tetrahymena

JOSEPH T. FRANCIS

JOSEPH T. FRANCIS

Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260

Search for more papers by this author
TODD M. HENNESSEY

Corresponding Author

TODD M. HENNESSEY

Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260

To whom correspondence should be addressed.Search for more papers by this author
First published: January 1995
Citations: 30

ABSTRACT

Although Paramecium has been widely used as a model sensory cell to study the cellular responses to thermal, mechanical and chemoattractant stimuli, little is known about their responses to chemorepellents. We have used a convenient capillary tube repellent bioassay to describe 4 different compounds that are chemorepellents for Paramecium and compared their response with those of Tetrahymena. The classical Paramecium t-maze chemokinesis test was also used to verify that this is a reliable chemorepellent assay. The first two compounds, GTP and the oxidant NBT, are known to be depolarizing chemorepellents in Paramecium but this is the first report of them as repellents in Tetrahymena. The second two compounds, the secretagogue alcian blue and the dye cibacron blue, have not previously been described as chemorepellents in either of these ciliates. Two other compounds, the secretagogue AED and the oxidant cytochrome c, were found to be repellents to Paramecium but not to Tetrahymena. The repellent nature of each of these compounds is not related to toxicity because cells are completely viable in all of them. More importantly, all of these repellents are effective at micromolar to nanomolar concentrations, providing an opportunity to use them as excitatory ligands in future works concerning their membrane receptors and possible receptor operated ion channels.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.