Volume 19, Issue 2 pp. 114-122

Left Ventricular Conduction Delays Induced by Right Ventricular Apical Pacing: Effect of Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Bundle Branch Block

NIRAJ VARMA M.D., F.R.C.P.

NIRAJ VARMA M.D., F.R.C.P.

Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 October 2007
Citations: 62
Address for correspondence: Niraj Varma, M.D., F.R.C.P., Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. Fax: 708-216-6829; E-mail: [email protected]

Manuscript received 18 May 2007; Revised manuscript received 20 August 2007; Accepted for publication 23 August 2007.

Abstract

Background: RV apical pacing (RVP) may be deleterious, possibly by simulating LBBB, i.e., prolonging QRS duration (QRSd) and LV activation (LVAT). However, determinants of electrical delays are unknown.

Hypothesis: LV dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 40%, HF) and pre-existing conduction system abnormalities may modulate RVP's effects, compared to LBBB.

Methods: RVP-induced QRSd and LVAT were compared in normal LV to HF, with normal QRS (<120 ms), RBBB, or LBBB. LVAT was estimated by interval from QRS onset to basal inferolateral LV depolarization.

Results: During LBBB and RVP, LVAT/QRSd was ≥85%, i.e., LVAT indicated terminal LV depolarization. In normal LV, LVAT during intrinsic conduction (55 ± 18 ms) was delayed by RVP (129 ± 20 ms, n = 58, P < 0.001). RVP's effects were similar to LBBB (P = NS) and unaffected by baseline conduction disease. In HF overall, RVP-induced delays (QRSd 209 ± 27, LVAT 186 ± 26 ms, n = 102) were greater than RVP in normal LV (P < 0.001). When baseline conduction system disease was present, RVP's effects were exaggerated (RVP wide QRS [>120 ms]: QRSd 216 ± 27, LVAT 191 ± 20 ms, [n = 72] vs RVP normal QRS: QRSd 193 ± 24, LVAT 169 ± 24 ms, n = 31, P < 0.001). In patients with LBBB (n = 41), delays during intrinsic conduction (QRSd 163 ± 29, LVAT 137 ± 33 ms, n = 41) were enhanced by RVP (QRSd 218 ± 28, LVAT 191 ± 22 ms, P < 0.001). RVP's effects were similar in patients with LBBB and RBBB (P = NS).

Conclusion: RVP simulated LBBB in normal LV. In HF, RVP induced greater conduction delays than LBBB, enhanced by accompanying conduction disease. These variations may contribute to RVP's mixed clinical effects.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.