Volume 28, Issue s1 pp. S36-S38

Characteristics of Bifocal Pacing:

Right Ventricular Apex versus Outflow Tract. An Interim Analysis

JAN C.J. RES

JAN C.J. RES

Department of Cardiology, Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
MARCEL J.J.A. BOKERN

MARCEL J.J.A. BOKERN

Department of Cardiology, Waterland Hospital, Purmerend, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
DICK H.S. VOS

DICK H.S. VOS

Department of Cardiology, VU Medical Center, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 January 2005
Citations: 10
Address for reprints: Dr. Jan C.J. Res, Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology, Zaans Medical Centre, P.O. Box 210, 1500 EE Zaandam, the Netherlands. Fax: +31 75 6145238; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Bifocal RIGHT ventricular stimulation (BRIGHT) is an ongoing, randomized, single-blind, crossover study of atrial synchronized bi-right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients in New York Heart Association heart failure functional class III, a left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, left bundle branch block and QRS complexes ≥120 ms. This analysis compared the electrical and handling characteristics, and the complications of pacing at the RV apex (Ap) with passive, versus RV outflow tract (OT) with active fixation leads. A mean of 1.6 ± 0.9 and 2.2 ± 2.0 attempts were needed to position the Ap and OT leads, respectively (ns). R-wave amplitudes at Ap versus OT were 23 ± 13 mV versus 14 ± 8 mV (n = 36, P < 0.001). R-wave amplitudes at the Ap remained stable between implant and M7. R-wave amplitudes at the OT could not be measured after implantation. In two patients, atrioventricular block occurred during active fixation at the OT. Conduction recovered spontaneously within 4 months. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in one patient during manipulation of an Ap lead in the RV. Marked differences were found between leads positioned in the OT versus Ap, partly related to the difference in lead design. Mean R-wave amplitude was higher at the Ap that at the OT. Ease and success rate of lead implant was similar in both positions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.