Volume 27, Issue 12 pp. 1594-1602

Short-Term Efficacy of a Telephone Intervention by Expert Nurses After An Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

CYNTHIA M. DOUGHERTY

CYNTHIA M. DOUGHERTY

School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
FRANCES MARCUS LEWIS

FRANCES MARCUS LEWIS

School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
ELAINE ADAMS THOMPSON

ELAINE ADAMS THOMPSON

School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
JUSTIN D. BAER

JUSTIN D. BAER

American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
WOOKSOO KIM

WOOKSOO KIM

School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 December 2004
Citations: 56
Address for reprints: Cynthia M. Dougherty, ARNP, PhD., Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing, Box 357266, Seattle, WA 98195. Fax: (206) 543-4771; e-mail: [email protected]

Supported in part by a National Institute for Nursing Research grant R01NRO4766 from the National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC.

Abstract

The ICD is a common therapy for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death. After ICD therapy, 50% of survivors are known to have significantly elevated anxiety, depression, anger, and fear in getting back to normal physical activities. Despite these problems, few interventions to improve adjustment have been rigorously evaluated within a clinical trial format. This article reports the short-term efficacy of a structured weekly educational telephone intervention (8 weeks) delivered by expert cardiovascular nurses to recipients of an ICD. To test these effects, a two-group (n = 84/group) randomized clinical trial design was used with measures at baseline (hospital discharge), 1 month, and 3 months after ICD therapy. The study sample were first time ICD recipients for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Primary outcomes included (1) physical functioning (Patient Concerns Assessment [PCA], Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12], ICD shocks), (2) psychological adjustment (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), Centers for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D), (3) knowledge (Sudden Cardiac Arrest [SCA] knowledge assessment), and (4) health care use (emergency room visits, outpatient visits, hospitalizations). The intervention group, as compared to the control group, significantly reduced mean PCA symptoms at 1 month (11.3–8.8 vs 9.7–9.3, respectively, P < 0.02), and reduced state anxiety (36.1–31.9 vs 33.1–33.0, respectively, P < 0.08), and enhanced knowledge (21.8–22.4 vs 21.4–21.7, respectively, P < 0.02) at 3 months. The intervention did not significantly impact short-term health care use. A structured telephone intervention delivered during the first 8 weeks after ICD therapy by expert cardiovascular nurses decreased ICD related physical symptoms and anxiety, and increased SCA knowledge over 3 months.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.