Volume 10, Issue 5 pp. 428-450

Current Knowledge of Buprenorphine and Its Unique Pharmacological Profile

Joseph Pergolizzi MD

Corresponding Author

Joseph Pergolizzi MD

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.;

Joseph Pergolizzi, MD, 4840 Sycamore Drive, Naples, FL 34119, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Anna Maria Aloisi MD, PhD

Anna Maria Aloisi MD, PhD

University of Siena, Siena, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author
Albert Dahan MD, PhD

Albert Dahan MD, PhD

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden, The Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
Joerg Filitz MD

Joerg Filitz MD

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany;

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Langford MD, PhD

Richard Langford MD, PhD

St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, U.K.;

Search for more papers by this author
Rudolf Likar MD, FRCA

Rudolf Likar MD, FRCA

Pain Clinic, General Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria;

Search for more papers by this author
Sebastiano Mercadante MD

Sebastiano Mercadante MD

La Maddalena Cancer Centre, Palermo, Sicily, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author
Bart Morlion MD

Bart Morlion MD

University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium;

Search for more papers by this author
Robert B. Raffa PhD

Robert B. Raffa PhD

School of Pharmacy and School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.;

Search for more papers by this author
Rainer Sabatowski MD

Rainer Sabatowski MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany;

Search for more papers by this author
Paola Sacerdote PhD

Paola Sacerdote PhD

Department of Pharmacology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy;

Search for more papers by this author
Luis M. Torres MD, PhD

Luis M. Torres MD, PhD

Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Unit Department, University Hospital, Puerta del Mar, Cadiz, Spain;

Search for more papers by this author
Avi A. Weinbroum MD

Avi A. Weinbroum MD

Post Anesthesia Care Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 August 2010
Citations: 215

Disclosure: Dr. Pergolizzi is a consultant for Grünenthal GmbH. There was industry funding involved in the Expert meeting sponsored by Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany and editorial support.

Abstract

Despite the increasing clinical use of transdermal buprenorphine, questions have persisted about the possibility of a ceiling effect for analgesia, its combination with other μ-opioid agonists, and the reversibility of side effects. In October 2008, a consensus group of experts met to review recent research into the pharmacology and clinical use of buprenorphine. The objective was to achieve consensus on the conclusions to be drawn from this work. It was agreed that buprenorphine clearly behaves as a full μ-opioid agonist for analgesia in clinical practice, with no ceiling effect, but that there is a ceiling effect for respiratory depression, reducing the likelihood of this potentially fatal adverse event. This is entirely consistent with receptor theory. In addition, the effects of buprenorphine can be completely reversed by naloxone. No problems are encountered when switching to and from buprenorphine and other opioids, or in combining them. Buprenorphine exhibits a pronounced antihyperalgesic effect that might indicate potential advantages in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Other beneficial properties are the compound's favorable safety profile, particularly in elderly patients and those with renal impairment, and its lack of effect on sex hormones and the immune system. The expert group agreed that these properties, as well as proven efficacy in severe pain and favorable tolerability, mean that buprenorphine can be considered a safe and effective option for treating chronic cancer and noncancer pain.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.