Volume 52, Issue 10 pp. 1877-1883
FULL-LENGTH ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of USL255, a new once-daily extended-release formulation of topiramate

Lawrence J. Lambrecht

Lawrence J. Lambrecht

Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Tawfeeq Shekh-Ahmad

Tawfeeq Shekh-Ahmad

School of Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Wesley M. Todd

Wesley M. Todd

Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Mark B. Halvorsen

Mark B. Halvorsen

Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Meir Bialer

Meir Bialer

School of Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

David R. Bloom Center for Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 July 2011
Citations: 22
Address correspondence to Professor Meir Bialer, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO 12065, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetics of USL255, a once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation of topiramate (TPM), with Topamax (immediate-release TPM) in healthy subjects after oral dosing and evaluate the effect of food on USL255 bioavailability and pharmacokinetics.

Methods: This randomized, single-center, open-label, cross-over design study had three dosing periods separated by 21 days of washout between treatments. Thirty-six volunteers received single doses of USL255 (200 mg) in fasted and fed conditions and two doses of Topamax (100 mg) administered 12 h apart. TPM plasma samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods.

Key Findings: USL255 fasted pharmacokinetic parameters [point estimate (90% confidence interval, CI) compared to Topamax] were: relative bioavailability (F´) 91.2% (84–99%), peak plasma concentration (Cmax) USL255/Topamax-ratio 59% (53–65%), time to reach Cmax (tmax) 19.5 ± 7.2 h, accumulation ratio (Rac) 3.9 ± 1.2, effective half-life (t1/2,eff) 55.7 ± 19.9 h, terminal half-life (t1/2,z) 80.2 ± 14.2 h, and peak-occupancy-time (POT) 12.1 ± 4.0 h. Although the F´ and Cmax were unaffected by food, Rac and t1/2,eff increased to 4.9 ± 0.9, and 72.5 ± 15.4 h, respectively. In contrast to t1/2,z, t1/2,eff reflects absorption rate; therefore, USL255’s t1/2,eff was significantly longer than Topamax’s t1/2,eff (37.1 ± 6.5 h).

Significance: Although bioequivalent to Topamax in extent of absorption, USL255 had a slower absorption rate as reflected in its lower Cmax and longer tmax, larger POT and longer t1/2,eff, and similar Rac values to that of Topamax (q12 h). This relative flat plasma profile allows for once-daily dosing with diminished fluctuations in TPM plasma levels. In addition, neither USL255’s peak nor extent of plasma exposure of TPM was affected by food.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me