Volume 52, Issue 10 pp. e135-e138
BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Replication of association between a SCN1A splice variant and febrile seizures

François Le Gal

François Le Gal

Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

Search for more papers by this author
Annick Salzmann

Annick Salzmann

Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

Search for more papers by this author
Arielle Crespel

Arielle Crespel

Department of Neurology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France

Search for more papers by this author
Alain Malafosse

Alain Malafosse

Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 July 2011
Citations: 13
Address correspondence to Alain Malafosse, Division of Medical Genetics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Hôpital Belle-Idée, 2 ch du Petit Bel-Air, 1225 Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In the present study, we assessed a SCN1A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs3812718, IVS5N+5 G>A), first analyzed by Schlachter et al. We genotyped 164 patients with febrile seizures (FS) [of those 62 adults with focal epilepsy (FEFS+) and 102 children with pure FS (Pure FS)] and 199 matched controls. Moreover, we also tested a third subgroup of 113 patients with focal epilepsy syndromes without a history of FS (FEFS); they all were Caucasian. Our results, as in the initial study of Schlachter et al., showed an increase in the A-allele and AA-genotype frequencies in patients with FS compared to the controls, but these current differences did not reach statistical significance. Subsequently, we pooled our data with previously published Caucasian groups. No statistically significant difference was found for the FEFS, but analyses for FEFS+ and Pure FS are significantly different compared to controls (p = 8.08 e−6 and p=3.56 e−4, respectively). Furthermore, pooled patients with FS (FS + FEFS+) tested against those without FS (Controls + FEFS) showed an even greater statistical significance (p=4.82 e−8). These results reinforced rs3812718 involvement in FS vulnerability.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me