Volume 38, Issue 12 pp. 1321-1329
Full Access

Localization of Epileptic Auras Induced on Stimulation by Subdural Electrodes

R. Schulz

R. Schulz

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
H. O. Lüders

Corresponding Author

H. O. Lüders

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. H. O. Lüders at Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
I. Tuxhorn

I. Tuxhorn

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
A. Ebner

A. Ebner

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
H. Holthausen

H. Holthausen

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
M. Hoppe

M. Hoppe

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
S. Noachtar

S. Noachtar

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Neurologische Klinik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Großhadern, München, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
H. Pannek

H. Pannek

Gilead gGmbH, Neurochirurgische Klinik, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Th. May

Th. May

Gesellschaft fur Epilepsieforschung, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
P. Wolf

P. Wolf

Mara gGmbH, Epilepsiezentrum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 August 2005
Citations: 46

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: This study evaluates the localization of stimulation-induced auras (SIA) and tries to determine whether the SIA can help to define the boundaries of resection in epilepsy surgery.

Methods: Using subdural grid electrodes, 31 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy were examined in a retrospective and prospective study lasting 2 years.

Results: On stimulation by subdural electrodes, we elicited habitual auras in 16 patients (52%). The zone of SIA overlapped the epileptogenic lesion in 12 patients (75%), the EEG seizure onset zone in 12 patients (75%), and the irritative zone of interictal spikes in eight patients (50%). Postoperative results showed a significant correlation with the complete removal of the epileptogenic lesion (p c 0.001). Because the number of patients in the study was small, we could not find a significant correlation with the complete removal of the SIA zone, EEG seizure onset zone. and irritative zone.

Conclusions: Our study confirms previous analyses which indicate that complete resection of the epileptogenic lesion is essential to achieve a good outcome. Frequent overlap of the SIA zone with the epileptogenic lesion and the EEG seizure onset zone indicates proximity of the SIA with the epileptogenic zone. Nevertheless, this study does not support the concept that the SIA zone and the EEG seizure onset zone have additional value in defining the boundaries of resection in epilepsy surgery. Three case presentations suggest that SIA result from facilitated pathways between the stimulated cortex, the epileptogenic zone around the lesion, and the symptomatogenic zone. Functional reorganization in the vicinity of the cortical lesion cannot be ruled out but was not seen in our patients. Thus, SIA often do not reflect the normal function of the stimulated underlying cortex.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me