Volume 45, Issue 6 pp. 1068-1078

Modality-specific attentional startle modulation during continuous performance tasks: A brief time is sufficient

Sakinah S.J. Alhadad

Sakinah S.J. Alhadad

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, 4072, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ottmar V. Lipp

Ottmar V. Lipp

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, 4072, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Helena M. Purkis

Helena M. Purkis

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, 4072, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 October 2008
Citations: 5
Address reprint requests to: Sakinah S.J. Alhadad or Ottmar V. Lipp, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD, 4072, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

Grant DP0450465 from the Australian Research Council supported this work.

Abstract

Attentional startle modulation has been found to be modality specific in continuous performance tasks (CPTs) and modality nonspecific in trial-structured tasks. Experiment 1 investigated whether attentional blink modulation in a CPT would change if a trial structure was imposed. Participants performed a visual CPT either continuously (CONT), or during brief periods of time signaled by a change in screen color with stimuli either presented all the time (MIXED) or only during the trial segments (DISC). Contrary to expectation, evidence for modality-specific attentional startle modulation—smaller acoustic startle during targets than during nontargets—was strongest in Groups MIXED and DISC. Experiment 2 confirmed that this pattern of results was present during the first stimulus of the task period in group DISC. This suggests that the continuous nature of a task is not critical in determining the attentional mechanisms engaged.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.