HATCHING ASYNCHRONY IN ALTRICIAL BIRDS

1. The review aims to provide a simple conceptual framework on which to place recent studies of hatching asynchrony in altricial birds and to assess the evidence used in support of specific hypotheses.

2. Hatching asynchrony arises bsecause parents start incubation before laying is complete, but the precision of parental control is largely unknown.

3. Hypothesses concerning the functional significance of hatching asynchrony fall into four broad types. Hatching asynchrony might: (i) arise because of selection on the timing of events during the nesting period; (ii) facilitate the adaptive reduction in brood size; (iii) increase the energetic efficiency of raising the brood, or (iv) result from environmental or phylogenetic constraints.

4. The incubation pattern could function to minimize the losses of eggs, nestlings or adults to predators (or climatic sources of mortality), particularly in species which cannot actively defend their nest. The best evidence comes from comparative studies of hatching asynchrony. Early incubation might also be favoured if the food supply declines sharply through the breeding season, although the evidence is weak and indirect, or if there is a risk of brood parasitism. In species in which only the female incubates, early incubation could ‘force’ the male to invest more in the nestlings, but this idea remains to be tested. Males may be constrained by the risk of cuckoldry to delay incubation until laying is complete.

5. Hatching asynchrony could be adaptive by enabling the efficient reduction of brood size if food proves short after hatching (primarily because of a shortage of food in the environment or possibly because of a large proportion of ‘expensive’ nestlings in the brood in species which are sexually dimorphic). Observational evidence is often consistent with this hypothesis but few experimental studies provide adequate tests. Brood reduction could be adaptive in species (primarily eagles and pelecaniformes) which lay an extra egg to act as insurance against hatching failure, and again hatching asynchrony might facilitate brood reduction, although there are few experimental tests on such species. Hatching asynchrony might also enable sex ratio manipulation through selective brood reduction, although there is as yet no clear supportive evidence.

6. Ins species in which young have a marked peak in energy demand during the period of parental care, hatching asynchrony can reduce the peak demand of the brood, which might allow the parents to raise more healthy young. In many species such savings are likely to be small or absent. There is some behavioural evidence that hatching asynchrony can reduce fighting amongst nestlings and therefore lead to the more efficient use of energy by the brood. In general this effect seems small and the only energetic study found no difference in the energy requirements of synchronous and asynchronous broods. Other possible energetic advantages to hatching asynchrony have not been tested.

7. Environmental conditions during laying can influence both egg size and laying interval in aerial insectivores, and might directly influence incubation in this and other groups. Thus some variation in hatching asynchrony and the relative size of siblings is probably non-adaptive. The variability of incubation pattern within and across species suggests that hatching asynchrony is not under strong phylogenetic constraint.

8. The hypotheses about the adaptive significance of hatching asynchrony are complementary rather than mutually exclusive: within a species, several selective pressures could influence the optimal incubation pattern, and the relative importance of selective pressures will differ among species. Furthermore one should expect that the incubation pattern and parent–offspring interactions will be coadapted to maximize brood productivity.